PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

3AAP.L (Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP) and 3ABN.L (Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 3AAP.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index while 3ABN.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 3AAP.L returned 16.18%/yr vs 312.05%/yr for 3ABN.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3AAP.L achieves a 29.86% return, which is significantly higher than 3ABN.L's -17.48% return.

3AAP.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
34.96%
YTD
29.86%
6M
16.84%
1Y
162.50%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
24.14%
10Y*
—

3ABN.L

1D
7.63%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
-17.48%
6M
18.31%
1Y
-30.56%
3Y*
312.05%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
3AAP.L
Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP		29.86%-28.23%70.02%151.70%-73.70%148.82%
3ABN.L
Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP		-17.48%12,760.97%-45.97%106.32%-96.11%4.99%

Correlation

The correlation between 3AAP.L and 3ABN.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2021

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between 3AAP.L and 3ABN.L has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP

Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP

Often compared with 3AAP.L:
3AAP.L vs. AAPL3AAP.L vs. 3XLE.L3AAP.L vs. 3XFE.L3AAP.L vs. 3BP.L3AAP.L vs. 2BRE.L3AAP.L vs. 3GOO.L3AAP.L vs. 3KOR.L
Often compared with 3ABN.L:
3ABN.L vs. 3NFE.L3ABN.L vs. TQQQ3ABN.L vs. KWE3.L3ABN.L vs. 3XFE.L3ABN.L vs. AMD3.L3ABN.L vs. 2AMD.L3ABN.L vs. 2GOO.L

Return for Risk

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
3AAP.L
3AAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
3ABN.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

3AAP.L3ABN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.64
-0.36

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.71
0.01

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.00

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

-0.54

+4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

-0.81

+7.96

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3AAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the 3ABN.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3AAP.L and 3ABN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

3AAP.L3ABN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

-0.36

+1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.00

+0.41

Drawdowns

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3AAP.L drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum 3ABN.L drawdown of -99.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3AAP.L and 3ABN.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

3AAP.L3ABN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.66%

-99.20%

+23.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.36%

-56.74%

+12.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.42%

-88.24%

+14.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.66%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.32%

-39.50%

+30.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.84%

-72.43%

+37.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.63%

37.50%

-14.87%

Volatility

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) is 15.65%, while Leverage Shares 3x Airbnb ETP Securities GBP (3ABN.L) has a volatility of 25.65%. This indicates that 3AAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3ABN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

3AAP.L3ABN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.65%

25.65%

-10.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.09%

68.67%

-19.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

98.77%

85.59%

+13.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.95%

9,929.19%

-9,842.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.95%

9,929.19%

-9,840.24%

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 3AAP.L and 3ABN.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

3AAP.L vs. 3ABN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 3AAP.L nor 3ABN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

3AAP.L and 3ABN.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

3AAP.L and 3ABN.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

3AAP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index, while 3ABN.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x ABNB Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3AAP.L and 3ABN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer