36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

36B5.DE (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 36B5.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 36B5.DE returned 5.01%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for NQSE.DE. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 36B5.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.

Performance

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B5.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 36B5.DE having a 17.40% return and NQSE.DE slightly higher at 17.82%.

36B5.DE

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 17.40%
• 6M: 18.30%
• 1Y: 35.45%
• 3Y*: 14.26%
• 5Y*: 5.01%
• 10Y*: —

NQSE.DE

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: 17.82%
• 6M: 17.09%
• 1Y: 35.67%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 14.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
36B5.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist	17.40%	16.82%	11.30%	-2.19%	-12.46%	7.05%	6.70%	11.16%
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	17.82%	18.16%	24.07%	52.10%	-36.29%	27.37%	45.23%	20.57%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B5.DE and NQSE.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019	0.58

The correlation between 36B5.DE and NQSE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B5.DE

36B5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 67
36B5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
36B5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
36B5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
36B5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
36B5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

NQSE.DE

NQSE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 66
NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
NQSE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
NQSE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NQSE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NQSE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B5.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	36B5.DE	NQSE.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.28	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	3.17	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	3.08	+0.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.71	10.77	+1.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the NQSE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B5.DE and NQSE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	36B5.DE	NQSE.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	2.28	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.71	-0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.82	-0.45

Drawdowns

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B5.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.40%, roughly equal to the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B5.DE and NQSE.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	36B5.DE	NQSE.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.40%	-37.67%	+1.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.04%	-11.87%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.62%	-22.40%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.22%	-37.67%	+12.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.94%	-0.84%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.18%	-8.56%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	3.40%	-0.58%

Volatility

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B5.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) at 4.75%. This indicates that 36B5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	36B5.DE	NQSE.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	4.75%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.73%	11.99%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.85%	16.05%	+0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.85%	20.91%	-4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.65%	21.54%	-1.89%

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B5.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

36B5.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while NQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
36B5.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist	1.78%	2.09%	2.34%	2.32%	2.31%	1.84%	1.57%	2.31%
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 36B5.DE and NQSE.DE in my portfolio?

36B5.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 36B5.DE or NQSE.DE?

On fees, 36B5.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 36B5.DE or NQSE.DE?

36B5.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for NQSE.DE.

What is the main difference between 36B5.DE and NQSE.DE?

36B5.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. 36B5.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for 36B5.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.