36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE
36B5.DE (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist) and GACB.DE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - 36B5.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels while GACB.DE tracks the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. 36B5.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GACB.DE.
Performance
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
36B5.DE
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 17.40%
- 6M
- 18.30%
- 1Y
- 35.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- —
GACB.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36B5.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist | 17.40% | 16.82% | 11.30% | -2.19% | -12.46% | 7.05% | 6.70% | 1.49% |
GACB.DE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 4.68% | 17.61% | 13.29% | 6.42% | -14.91% | 7.63% | 1.70% | 2.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between 36B5.DE and GACB.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between 36B5.DE and GACB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
36B5.DE
GACB.DE
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B5.DE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) (GACB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 36B5.DE | GACB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 36B5.DE | GACB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | — | — |
Drawdowns
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 36B5.DE | GACB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.18% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 36B5.DE | GACB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.85% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | — | — |
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
36B5.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GACB.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
36B5.DE vs. GACB.DE - Dividend Comparison
36B5.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, while GACB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36B5.DE iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.78% | 2.09% | 2.34% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 1.84% | 1.57% | 2.31% |
GACB.DE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF CLASS USD (Acc.) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
36B5.DE and GACB.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 36B5.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36B5.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GACB.DE.
36B5.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while GACB.DE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for 36B5.DE and 0.49% for GACB.DE.
Find the right allocation for 36B5.DE and GACB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer