PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36B4.DE achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly lower than TTPX.DE's 19.69% return.


36B4.DE

1D
-1.25%
1M
5.00%
6M
5.52%
YTD
9.48%
1Y
22.17%
3Y*
9.80%
5Y*
4.99%
10Y*

TTPX.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
1.83%
6M
12.92%
YTD
19.69%
1Y
47.14%
3Y*
26.41%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
13.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
9.48%6.64%9.02%9.56%-13.77%9.87%6.38%16.82%
TTPX.DE
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc)
19.69%27.49%21.75%32.48%-4.73%10.61%5.85%7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B4.DE and TTPX.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2019

0.79

The correlation between 36B4.DE and TTPX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B4.DE
36B4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

TTPX.DE
TTPX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TTPX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTPX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


36B4.DETTPX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

4.79

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.90

16.56

-10.66

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the TTPX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B4.DE and TTPX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B4.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.98%, smaller than the maximum TTPX.DE drawdown of -36.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B4.DE and TTPX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B4.DETTPX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.98%

-36.52%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-9.80%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-20.65%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.57%

-20.65%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-1.56%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-7.80%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

2.84%

+0.91%

Volatility

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) is 5.12%, while Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc) (TTPX.DE) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that 36B4.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTPX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B4.DETTPX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

5.73%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

15.34%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

19.36%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

18.07%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

18.14%

-0.88%

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B4.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than TTPX.DE's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

36B4.DE vs. TTPX.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while TTPX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.47%1.46%1.38%1.81%2.45%1.54%1.60%0.81%
TTPX.DE
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF Daily Hedged EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


36B4.DE and TTPX.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 36B4.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

36B4.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for TTPX.DE.

36B4.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while TTPX.DE tracks TOPIX Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 36B4.DE and 0.48% for TTPX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B4.DE and TTPX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer