PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36B4.DE achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly lower than SMLN.DE's 15.87% return.


36B4.DE

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.36%
YTD
3.58%
6M
3.67%
1Y
10.86%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
4.17%
10Y*

SMLN.DE

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.39%
YTD
15.87%
6M
15.98%
1Y
29.39%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
3.58%6.51%9.11%9.64%-13.87%9.91%6.29%17.07%
SMLN.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF
15.87%12.69%12.93%16.15%-11.17%8.51%4.78%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B4.DE and SMLN.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2019

0.95

The correlation between 36B4.DE and SMLN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B4.DE
36B4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLN.DE
SMLN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


36B4.DESMLN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.30

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.99

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.55

9.93

-7.38

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B4.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the SMLN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B4.DE and SMLN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


36B4.DESMLN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.56

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.60

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.51

-0.15

Drawdowns

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B4.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.99%, smaller than the maximum SMLN.DE drawdown of -28.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B4.DE and SMLN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B4.DESMLN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.99%

-28.42%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-9.43%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.74%

-15.55%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

-19.85%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.49%

-1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-6.03%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

2.84%

+1.04%

Volatility

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist (36B4.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (SMLN.DE) at 3.44%. This indicates that 36B4.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B4.DESMLN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

3.44%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

14.75%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

18.07%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

16.12%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

16.22%

+1.02%

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B4.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLN.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

36B4.DE vs. SMLN.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B4.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, while SMLN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B4.DE
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD Dist
1.41%1.46%1.38%1.81%2.44%1.54%1.61%0.81%
SMLN.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


36B4.DE and SMLN.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMLN.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMLN.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for 36B4.DE.

36B4.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuels, while SMLN.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei 400. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for 36B4.DE and 0.19% for SMLN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B4.DE and SMLN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer