PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 36B1.DE having a 5.59% return and JPBM.DE slightly lower at 5.47%.


36B1.DE

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.73%
YTD
5.59%
6M
5.87%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
7.12%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*

JPBM.DE

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.61%
YTD
5.47%
6M
5.74%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
5.59%0.52%11.39%6.09%-13.65%5.10%-3.83%3.83%-0.76%
JPBM.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
5.47%0.87%7.74%5.71%-10.77%5.50%-4.06%21.24%2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B1.DE and JPBM.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018

0.80

The correlation between 36B1.DE and JPBM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B1.DE
36B1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

JPBM.DE
JPBM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JPBM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPBM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


36B1.DEJPBM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

4.16

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.59

12.20

+0.39

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the JPBM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B1.DE and JPBM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B1.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum JPBM.DE drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B1.DE and JPBM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B1.DEJPBM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.35%

-25.94%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-3.07%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.32%

-12.49%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.23%

-14.10%

-2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.43%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.50%

-9.28%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.05%

-0.06%

Volatility

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.67% compared to JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist) (JPBM.DE) at 1.55%. This indicates that 36B1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPBM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B1.DEJPBM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

1.55%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

4.13%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.15%

5.93%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.53%

8.49%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.18%

14.89%

-4.71%

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B1.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JPBM.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

36B1.DE vs. JPBM.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, which matches JPBM.DE's 5.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
5.61%5.96%5.31%5.52%5.19%3.36%3.81%4.65%0.44%
JPBM.DE
JPMorgan USD Emerging Markets Sovereign Bond UCITS ETF - USD (Dist)
5.66%6.24%5.67%5.42%5.58%3.96%4.40%4.40%4.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


36B1.DE and JPBM.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPBM.DE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPBM.DE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 36B1.DE.

36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while JPBM.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 36B1.DE and 0.39% for JPBM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B1.DE and JPBM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer