36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE
36B1.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF) and IS0Q.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds from iShares - 36B1.DE tracks the JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified while IS0Q.DE tracks the J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 36B1.DE returned 1.88%/yr vs 2.56%/yr for IS0Q.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 36B1.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IS0Q.DE.
Performance
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 36B1.DE having a 4.50% return and IS0Q.DE slightly lower at 4.48%.
36B1.DE
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 10.75%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0Q.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 2.56%
- 10Y*
- 3.10%
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36B1.DE iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 4.50% | 0.52% | 11.39% | 6.09% | -13.65% | 5.10% | -3.83% | 1.34% | -1.20% |
IS0Q.DE iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.48% | -3.70% | 12.34% | 4.23% | -6.55% | 7.84% | -2.78% | 16.71% | 2.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between 36B1.DE and IS0Q.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018 | 0.70 |
The correlation between 36B1.DE and IS0Q.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank
36B1.DE
IS0Q.DE
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 36B1.DE | IS0Q.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.73 | 2.38 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.56 | 6.80 | +3.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36B1.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, smaller than the maximum IS0Q.DE drawdown of -26.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B1.DE and IS0Q.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 36B1.DE | IS0Q.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -26.03% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -2.99% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.32% | -11.02% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.23% | -11.02% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -2.21% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.65% | -7.55% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.05% | -0.03% |
Volatility
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.29% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0Q.DE) at 0.98%. This indicates that 36B1.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS0Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 36B1.DE | IS0Q.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.29% | 0.98% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.07% | 3.55% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.02% | 5.41% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.51% | 7.04% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.17% | 8.76% | +1.41% |
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
36B1.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IS0Q.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
36B1.DE vs. IS0Q.DE - Dividend Comparison
36B1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than IS0Q.DE's 5.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36B1.DE iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF | 5.66% | 5.96% | 5.31% | 5.52% | 5.19% | 3.36% | 3.81% | 2.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IS0Q.DE iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.51% | 5.61% | 5.36% | 5.07% | 4.31% | 3.54% | 4.14% | 4.58% | 4.69% | 4.55% | 4.51% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
36B1.DE and IS0Q.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 36B1.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36B1.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS0Q.DE.
36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while IS0Q.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 36B1.DE and 0.50% for IS0Q.DE.
Find the right allocation for 36B1.DE and IS0Q.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer