PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with 36B1.DE having a 2.43% return and EMA5.DE slightly lower at 2.33%.


36B1.DE

1D
0.13%
1M
1.40%
YTD
2.43%
6M
1.88%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
5.51%
5Y*
2.20%
10Y*

EMA5.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.24%
YTD
2.33%
6M
1.80%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
5.12%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
2.43%-0.10%10.86%5.55%-13.71%6.46%-0.59%
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
2.33%-2.57%14.01%3.79%-5.07%7.86%-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B1.DE and EMA5.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.75

The correlation between 36B1.DE and EMA5.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B1.DE
36B1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA5.DE
EMA5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) and L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


36B1.DEEMA5.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.13

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.38

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.72

3.47

+3.25

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the EMA5.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B1.DE and EMA5.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


36B1.DEEMA5.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.72

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.47

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.47

-0.24

Drawdowns

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B1.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.46%, which is greater than EMA5.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B1.DE and EMA5.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B1.DEEMA5.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.46%

-10.01%

-12.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.95%

-3.06%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.43%

-10.01%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-10.01%

-6.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-3.17%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.64%

-3.55%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

1.22%

-0.06%

Volatility

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF (36B1.DE) is 1.21%, while L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF (EMA5.DE) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that 36B1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMA5.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B1.DEEMA5.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

2.25%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

4.23%

-0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.87%

5.86%

+0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.41%

7.07%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.55%

6.94%

+2.61%

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B1.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EMA5.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

36B1.DE vs. EMA5.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B1.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than EMA5.DE's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B1.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF
4.93%5.22%4.96%5.09%5.00%4.57%3.40%4.19%
EMA5.DE
L&G ESG Emerging Markets Government Bond (USD) 0-5 Year UCITS ETF
4.59%5.61%5.39%4.22%2.89%1.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


36B1.DE and EMA5.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMA5.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMA5.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 36B1.DE.

36B1.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified, while EMA5.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified Short-Term Custom Maturity. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 36B1.DE and 0.25% for EMA5.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B1.DE and EMA5.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer