3145.HK vs. 2800.HK
3145.HK (ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF) and 2800.HK (Tracker Fund of Hong Kong) are both exchange-traded funds - 3145.HK is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg APAC High Dividend 40 Net Return Index, while 2800.HK is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 3145.HK returned 10.34%/yr vs 4.65%/yr for 2800.HK. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 3145.HK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for 2800.HK.
Performance
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 3145.HK achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than 2800.HK's -1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, 3145.HK has outperformed 2800.HK with an annualized return of 10.34%, while 2800.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 4.65% annualized return.
3145.HK
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.39%
2800.HK
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- 6M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong | HK$19.24B | HK$19.19B | HK$19.22B |
| HK$14.01M | HK$20.09M | HK$17.30M |
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3145.HK ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF | 12.74% | 22.59% | 17.17% | 11.62% | -11.17% | 6.94% | 3.52% | 19.78% | -8.87% | 39.80% |
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong | -1.14% | 31.39% | 22.40% | -10.55% | -11.90% | -11.96% | -0.75% | 12.96% | -10.08% | 40.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between 3145.HK and 2800.HK is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014 | 0.65 |
The correlation between 3145.HK and 2800.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK — Risk / Return Rank
3145.HK
2800.HK
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF (3145.HK) and Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 3145.HK | 2800.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.03 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.10 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.31 | 0.27 | +5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 3145.HK drawdown since its inception was -34.05%, smaller than the maximum 2800.HK drawdown of -63.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3145.HK and 2800.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 3145.HK | 2800.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.05% | -63.92% | +29.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.45% | -17.49% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.46% | -24.13% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.22% | -43.50% | +15.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.05% | -49.39% | +15.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.21% | -9.42% | +5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -22.69% | +14.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 6.61% | -2.69% |
Volatility
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF (3145.HK) is 4.79%, while Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that 3145.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2800.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 3145.HK | 2800.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 6.35% | -1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 14.44% | -2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.59% | 19.00% | -4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 24.78% | -9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 21.39% | -5.86% |
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison
3145.HK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than 2800.HK's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
3145.HK vs. 2800.HK - Dividend Comparison
3145.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.79%, more than 2800.HK's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong | 2.92% | 2.98% | 3.80% | 3.78% | 3.21% | 2.85% | 2.74% | 3.27% | 3.65% | 3.09% | 3.53% | 3.67% |
3145.HK ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF | 7.79% | 3.82% | 2.51% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.68% | 2.79% | 2.22% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 2.94% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
3145.HK and 2800.HK have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2800.HK is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2800.HK is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 3145.HK.
3145.HK is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while 2800.HK is China Equities. 3145.HK tracks Bloomberg APAC High Dividend 40 Net Return Index, while 2800.HK tracks Hang Seng Index. They also come from different issuers: ChinaAMC and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for 3145.HK and 0.10% for 2800.HK.
Find the right allocation for 3145.HK and 2800.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer