PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF (3110.HK) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ZPRG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

3110.HK is traded in HKD, while ZPRG.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ZPRG.DE values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 3110.HK achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than ZPRG.DE's 6.61% return. Over the past 10 years, 3110.HK has outperformed ZPRG.DE with an annualized return of 10.04%, while ZPRG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.44% annualized return.


3110.HK

1D
-0.37%
1M
-4.20%
YTD
5.85%
6M
4.00%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
10.04%

ZPRG.DE

1D
0.53%
1M
-2.29%
YTD
6.61%
6M
7.94%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
3110.HK
Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF
5.85%35.55%32.28%-3.89%-8.03%7.61%-6.80%7.58%-3.43%42.22%
ZPRG.DE
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
6.61%18.79%6.14%6.75%-6.49%16.00%-9.86%20.35%-9.53%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between 3110.HK and ZPRG.DE is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2013

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3110.HK
3110.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
3110.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3110.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
3110.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
3110.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
3110.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPRG.DE
ZPRG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
ZPRG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF (3110.HK) and SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ZPRG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


3110.HKZPRG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

2.26

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

6.85

+3.94

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 3110.HK Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the ZPRG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 3110.HK and ZPRG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


3110.HKZPRG.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.62

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.40

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.40

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.38

+0.06

Drawdowns

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 3110.HK drawdown since its inception was -34.74%, smaller than the maximum ZPRG.DE drawdown of -42.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 3110.HK and ZPRG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


3110.HKZPRG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.74%

-42.85%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.87%

-7.45%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-14.06%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-20.33%

-13.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.74%

-42.85%

+8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-2.57%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-6.26%

-5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.46%

+0.14%

Volatility

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF (3110.HK) is 3.03%, while SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ZPRG.DE) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that 3110.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPRG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


3110.HKZPRG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

3.21%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

7.36%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

10.43%

+3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.73%

14.14%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.18%

16.07%

+6.11%

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

3110.HK has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPRG.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

3110.HK vs. ZPRG.DE - Dividend Comparison

3110.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than ZPRG.DE's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
3110.HK
Global X Hang Seng High Dividend Yield ETF
5.89%6.15%6.81%8.30%7.34%7.32%5.23%0.00%6.32%4.28%5.69%0.00%
ZPRG.DE
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
3.89%4.25%3.73%4.22%4.49%3.57%3.98%3.44%3.95%3.36%3.62%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


3110.HK and ZPRG.DE have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRG.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRG.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for 3110.HK.

3110.HK is categorized as China Equities, while ZPRG.DE is Global Equity Income. 3110.HK tracks Hang Seng High Dividend Yield Index, while ZPRG.DE tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Quality Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for 3110.HK and 0.45% for ZPRG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 3110.HK and ZPRG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer