2FB.L vs. SUK2.L
2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) and SUK2.L (L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - 2FB.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index, while SUK2.L is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE 100 Daily Super Short Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2FB.L returned -2.68%/yr vs -17.69%/yr for SUK2.L. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. 2FB.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SUK2.L.
Performance
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2FB.L achieves a -21.96% return, which is significantly lower than SUK2.L's -12.71% return.
2FB.L
- 1D
- -13.16%
- 1M
- 13.32%
- 6M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -21.96%
- 1Y
- -36.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.68%
- 10Y*
- —
SUK2.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -7.72%
- YTD
- -12.71%
- 1Y
- -27.94%
- 3Y*
- -19.62%
- 5Y*
- -17.69%
- 10Y*
- -17.07%
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -21.96% | -8.57% | 128.56% | 597.14% | -92.16% | 43.03% | 34.26% | 99.79% | -63.43% | -3.05% |
SUK2.L L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | -12.71% | -32.13% | -6.81% | -6.41% | -13.97% | -32.73% | -1.17% | -29.96% | 15.40% | -10.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2FB.L and SUK2.L is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2017 | -0.33 |
The correlation between 2FB.L and SUK2.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (all time) to -0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L — Risk / Return Rank
2FB.L
SUK2.L
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 2FB.L | SUK2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.80 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | -0.91 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | -1.45 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2FB.L drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, roughly equal to the maximum SUK2.L drawdown of -98.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2FB.L and SUK2.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2FB.L | SUK2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.13% | -98.38% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.32% | -30.53% | -29.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.66% | -52.62% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.13% | -65.37% | -30.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.92% | -98.31% | +45.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.80% | -84.98% | +43.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.46% | 18.90% | +18.56% |
Volatility
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) has a higher volatility of 38.85% compared to L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L) at 5.69%. This indicates that 2FB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUK2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2FB.L | SUK2.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.85% | 5.69% | +33.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.02% | 19.48% | +44.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.50% | 22.53% | +55.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.89% | 25.52% | +60.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.59% | 29.98% | +49.61% |
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2FB.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SUK2.L's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
2FB.L vs. SUK2.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2FB.L nor SUK2.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2FB.L and SUK2.L have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUK2.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUK2.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2FB.L.
2FB.L is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SUK2.L is Inverse Equities. 2FB.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index, while SUK2.L tracks FTSE 100 Daily Super Short Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for 2FB.L and 0.60% for SUK2.L.
Find the right allocation for 2FB.L and SUK2.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer