2FB.L vs. MAGD.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L).

2FB.L and MAGD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2FB.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2017. MAGD.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025.

Performance

2FB.L vs. MAGD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2FB.L vs. MAGD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP	-27.03%	-25.92%
MAGD.L IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP	-18.43%	13.04%

Different Trading Currencies

2FB.L is traded in GBp, while MAGD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAGD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2FB.L achieves a -27.03% return, which is significantly lower than MAGD.L's -18.43% return.

2FB.L

• 1D: 8.23%
• 1M: -21.54%
• YTD: -27.03%
• 6M: -40.25%
• 1Y: -24.39%
• 3Y*: 56.32%
• 5Y*: 0.64%
• 10Y*: —

MAGD.L

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: -18.43%
• 6M: -17.84%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2FB.L vs. MAGD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

2FB.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGD.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

2FB.L

Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP

MAGD.L

IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP

Return for Risk

2FB.L vs. MAGD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2FB.L

2FB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
2FB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
2FB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
2FB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9
2FB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
2FB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2FB.L vs. MAGD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP (MAGD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2FB.L	MAGD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.34	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.94	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2FB.L	MAGD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	-0.47	+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between 2FB.L and MAGD.L is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

2FB.L vs. MAGD.L - Dividend Comparison

2FB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%.

	TTM	2025
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP	0.00%	0.00%
MAGD.L IncomeShares Magnificent 7 Options ETP	0.25%	0.07%

Drawdowns

2FB.L vs. MAGD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2FB.L drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, which is greater than MAGD.L's maximum drawdown of -28.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2FB.L and MAGD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	2FB.L	MAGD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.13%	-27.28%	-68.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.98%	-26.11%	-29.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.52%	-8.36%	-31.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	2FB.L	MAGD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	49.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.29%	21.63%	+49.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.24%	21.63%	+61.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	78.67%	21.63%	+57.04%