2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L).
2FB.L and 3QQQ.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 2FB.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2017. 3QQQ.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 6, 2022.
Performance
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -27.03% | -8.57% | 128.56% | 597.14% | -69.74% |
3QQQ.L Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities | -17.76% | 5.78% | 63.73% | 172.86% | -55.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
2FB.L is traded in GBp, while 3QQQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3QQQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2FB.L achieves a -27.03% return, which is significantly lower than 3QQQ.L's -17.76% return.
2FB.L
- 1D
- 8.23%
- 1M
- -21.54%
- YTD
- -27.03%
- 6M
- -40.25%
- 1Y
- -24.39%
- 3Y*
- 56.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
3QQQ.L
- 1D
- 8.47%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -17.76%
- 6M
- -15.54%
- 1Y
- 32.90%
- 3Y*
- 35.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2FB.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than 3QQQ.L's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
2FB.L
3QQQ.L
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2FB.L | 3QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | 0.47 | -0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | 1.19 | -1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 0.67 | -1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 1.48 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2FB.L | 3QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 | 0.47 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.25 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between 2FB.L and 3QQQ.L is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2FB.L nor 3QQQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2FB.L drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, which is greater than 3QQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -58.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2FB.L and 3QQQ.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2FB.L | 3QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.13% | -58.93% | -37.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.32% | -47.89% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.98% | -42.24% | -13.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.52% | -20.85% | -18.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.96% | 21.13% | +5.83% |
Volatility
2FB.L vs. 3QQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) has a higher volatility of 26.01% compared to Leverage Shares 3x Long US Tech 100 ETP Securities (3QQQ.L) at 16.66%. This indicates that 2FB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3QQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 2FB.L | 3QQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.01% | 16.66% | +9.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.53% | 53.57% | -4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.29% | 70.31% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.24% | 63.16% | +20.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.67% | 63.16% | +15.51% |