PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2FB.L is traded in GBp, while 3AMZ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 3AMZ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2FB.L achieves a -37.06% return, which is significantly lower than 3AMZ.L's -4.42% return.


2FB.L

1D
-4.35%
1M
-17.47%
YTD
-37.06%
6M
-36.55%
1Y
-50.20%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
-6.69%
10Y*

3AMZ.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-23.40%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-4.36%
1Y
-1.12%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
-24.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
2FB.L
Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP
-37.06%-8.57%128.56%597.14%-92.16%43.03%16.55%
3AMZ.L
Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC
-4.42%-42.82%114.50%249.87%-93.62%-9.92%57.37%

Correlation

The correlation between 2FB.L and 3AMZ.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020

0.58

The correlation between 2FB.L and 3AMZ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2FB.L
2FB.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
2FB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2FB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
2FB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
2FB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
2FB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

3AMZ.L
3AMZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
3AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
3AMZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2FB.L3AMZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.10

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

-0.02

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

-0.04

-1.38

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2FB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the 3AMZ.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2FB.L and 3AMZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2FB.L drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, roughly equal to the maximum 3AMZ.L drawdown of -96.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2FB.L and 3AMZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2FB.L3AMZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.13%

-96.32%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.32%

-61.49%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.66%

-74.12%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.13%

-95.75%

-0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.03%

-84.42%

+22.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.71%

-69.63%

+27.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.33%

31.09%

+4.24%

Volatility

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) is 21.64%, while Leverage Shares 3x Amazon ETC (3AMZ.L) has a volatility of 30.39%. This indicates that 2FB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3AMZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2FB.L3AMZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.64%

30.39%

-8.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.17%

74.09%

-20.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.56%

103.45%

-34.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.15%

103.84%

-19.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.73%

101.90%

-23.17%

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2FB.L and 3AMZ.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2FB.L vs. 3AMZ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2FB.L nor 3AMZ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2FB.L and 3AMZ.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2FB.L and 3AMZ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2FB.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index, while 3AMZ.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AMZN Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2FB.L and 3AMZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer