2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L
2FB.L (Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP) and 3AAP.L (Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 2FB.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index while 3AAP.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2FB.L returned 0.08%/yr vs 24.14%/yr for 3AAP.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2FB.L achieves a -16.41% return, which is significantly lower than 3AAP.L's 29.86% return.
2FB.L
- 1D
- 7.11%
- 1M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- -16.41%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- -28.39%
- 3Y*
- 38.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
3AAP.L
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 34.96%
- YTD
- 29.86%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 162.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 24.14%
- 10Y*
- —
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2FB.L Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP | -16.41% | -8.57% | 128.56% | 597.14% | -92.16% | 43.03% | 20.40% |
3AAP.L Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP | 29.86% | -28.23% | 70.02% | 151.70% | -73.70% | 95.43% | 218.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2FB.L and 3AAP.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.42 |
Over the past year, the correlation between 2FB.L and 3AAP.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L — Risk / Return Rank
2FB.L
3AAP.L
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2FB.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.36 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 3.64 | -4.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 7.15 | -8.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2FB.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 1.64 | -2.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.28 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.41 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2FB.L drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, which is greater than 3AAP.L's maximum drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2FB.L and 3AAP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2FB.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.13% | -75.66% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.32% | -44.36% | -15.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.66% | -73.42% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.13% | -75.66% | -20.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.57% | -9.32% | -40.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.73% | -34.84% | -4.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.69% | 22.63% | +10.06% |
Volatility
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2x Facebook ETC A GBP (2FB.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Apple ETP Securities GBP (3AAP.L) have volatilities of 15.00% and 15.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2FB.L | 3AAP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.00% | 15.65% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.06% | 49.09% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.69% | 98.77% | -32.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.82% | 86.95% | -3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.67% | 88.95% | -10.28% |
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 2FB.L and 3AAP.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
2FB.L vs. 3AAP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2FB.L nor 3AAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2FB.L and 3AAP.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2FB.L and 3AAP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
2FB.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x FB Index, while 3AAP.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X AAPL Index.
Find the right allocation for 2FB.L and 3AAP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer