PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Alibaba ETC GBP (2BAB.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2BAB.L is traded in GBp, while MAG7.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MAG7.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2BAB.L achieves a -33.20% return, which is significantly lower than MAG7.L's 0.03% return.


2BAB.L

1D
-1.14%
1M
-11.39%
YTD
-33.20%
6M
-43.27%
1Y
-10.52%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
-39.58%
10Y*

MAG7.L

1D
5.22%
1M
14.29%
YTD
0.03%
6M
-2.09%
1Y
128.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
2BAB.L
Leverage Shares 2x Alibaba ETC GBP
-33.20%106.46%23.59%
MAG7.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities
0.03%-33.53%153.25%

Correlation

The correlation between 2BAB.L and MAG7.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2BAB.L
2BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
2BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
2BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
2BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
2BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

MAG7.L
MAG7.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAG7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Alibaba ETC GBP (2BAB.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2BAB.LMAG7.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.24

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

1.78

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.29

4.31

-4.60

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2BAB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the MAG7.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2BAB.L and MAG7.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2BAB.LMAG7.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

1.32

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.43

0.22

-0.65

Drawdowns

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2BAB.L drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, which is greater than MAG7.L's maximum drawdown of -91.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2BAB.L and MAG7.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2BAB.LMAG7.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.36%

-91.62%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.13%

-71.53%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.97%

-48.83%

-48.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.98%

-48.64%

-37.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.42%

29.64%

+6.78%

Volatility

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2x Alibaba ETC GBP (2BAB.L) has a higher volatility of 32.07% compared to Leverage Shares 5x Long Magnificent 7 ETP Securities (MAG7.L) at 27.37%. This indicates that 2BAB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAG7.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2BAB.LMAG7.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.07%

27.37%

+4.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.22%

70.67%

-11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.63%

96.53%

-12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

98.98%

123.90%

-24.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.47%

123.90%

-27.43%

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both 2BAB.L and MAG7.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

2BAB.L vs. MAG7.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2BAB.L nor MAG7.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2BAB.L and MAG7.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2BAB.L and MAG7.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

2BAB.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 2X BABA Index, while MAG7.L tracks Solactive Magnificent 7 Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2BAB.L and MAG7.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer