PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7S.DE achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.


2B7S.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-0.20%
6M
0.00%
1Y
1.20%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
0.00%
10Y*

PPFB.DE

1D
0.61%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
2.74%
6M
5.47%
1Y
31.35%
3Y*
28.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
2B7S.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
-0.20%3.04%2.49%1.90%-5.78%-0.99%
PPFB.DE
iShares Physical Gold ETC
2.74%49.11%34.17%9.42%7.03%2.86%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7S.DE and PPFB.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021

0.18

The correlation between 2B7S.DE and PPFB.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7S.DE
2B7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

PPFB.DE
PPFB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPFB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B7S.DEPPFB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.26

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.81

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

4.60

-1.32

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the PPFB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7S.DE and PPFB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7S.DE drawdown since its inception was -7.68%, smaller than the maximum PPFB.DE drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7S.DE and PPFB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7S.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-16.60%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.98%

-16.60%

+15.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

-16.60%

+15.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-15.00%

+14.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-4.42%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

6.55%

-6.19%

Volatility

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) is 0.81%, while iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that 2B7S.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7S.DEPPFB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

5.11%

-4.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

20.18%

-18.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50%

23.12%

-20.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.50%

16.13%

-13.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.45%

16.13%

-13.68%

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7S.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

2B7S.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B7S.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7S.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7S.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7S.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for PPFB.DE.

2B7S.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. 2B7S.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year (EUR Hedged) Index, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 2B7S.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7S.DE and PPFB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer