PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B7F.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7F.DE achieves a 29.78% return, which is significantly higher than IS3Q.DE's 9.47% return.


2B7F.DE

1D
-0.59%
1M
8.63%
YTD
29.78%
6M
27.32%
1Y
43.79%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*

IS3Q.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
4.24%
YTD
9.47%
6M
10.10%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
2B7F.DE
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
29.78%4.63%11.96%35.07%-31.05%32.27%26.22%41.89%-13.86%
IS3Q.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
9.47%2.80%23.78%21.70%-14.84%34.28%4.44%33.90%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7F.DE and IS3Q.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2018

0.83

The correlation between 2B7F.DE and IS3Q.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7F.DE
2B7F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
2B7F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3Q.DE
IS3Q.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3Q.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B7F.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7F.DEIS3Q.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.33

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.97

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

11.80

-1.66

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7F.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IS3Q.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7F.DE and IS3Q.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7F.DEIS3Q.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.76

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.79

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.76

-0.14

Drawdowns

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7F.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, which is greater than IS3Q.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7F.DE and IS3Q.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7F.DEIS3Q.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-32.31%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-6.33%

-6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.34%

-20.63%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-20.63%

-14.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.12%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-4.61%

-5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

1.60%

+2.71%

Volatility

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B7F.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3Q.DE) at 2.37%. This indicates that 2B7F.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IS3Q.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7F.DEIS3Q.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.47%

2.37%

+5.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

7.31%

+9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.98%

10.66%

+11.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.79%

14.15%

+7.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

14.89%

+7.46%

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7F.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3Q.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

2B7F.DE vs. IS3Q.DE - Dividend Comparison

2B7F.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, while IS3Q.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
2B7F.DE
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
0.27%0.35%0.35%0.45%0.57%0.31%0.35%0.78%1.18%
IS3Q.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7F.DE and IS3Q.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3Q.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3Q.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B7F.DE.

2B7F.DE is categorized as Robotics, while IS3Q.DE is Global Equities. 2B7F.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while IS3Q.DE tracks MSCI World Sector Neutral Quality. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B7F.DE and 0.30% for IS3Q.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7F.DE and IS3Q.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer