PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7A.DE achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than LSMC.DE's 54.19% return.


2B7A.DE

1D
-1.31%
1M
1.55%
6M
7.32%
YTD
9.60%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.37%

LSMC.DE

1D
2.65%
1M
-11.43%
6M
43.66%
YTD
54.19%
1Y
90.26%
3Y*
57.38%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
33.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
2B7A.DE
iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
9.60%2.87%29.81%-11.36%8.45%3.10%
LSMC.DE
Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF
54.19%32.60%66.51%74.52%-34.67%-0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7A.DE and LSMC.DE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7A.DE
2B7A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
2B7A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

LSMC.DE
LSMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2B7A.DELSMC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.39

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

5.78

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

18.45

-15.80

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2B7A.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the LSMC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2B7A.DE and LSMC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7A.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum LSMC.DE drawdown of -39.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7A.DE and LSMC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7A.DELSMC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-39.64%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

-15.54%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.91%

-36.22%

+19.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.87%

-13.30%

+10.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-11.33%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.65%

4.87%

-0.22%

Volatility

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) is 4.00%, while Amundi MSCI Semiconductors ESG Screened UCITS ETF (LSMC.DE) has a volatility of 14.26%. This indicates that 2B7A.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7A.DELSMC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

14.26%

-10.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

26.51%

-14.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

33.97%

-18.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

32.74%

-15.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

32.74%

-13.33%

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

2B7A.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LSMC.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

2B7A.DE vs. LSMC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 2B7A.DE nor LSMC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7A.DE and LSMC.DE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7A.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7A.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

2B7A.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while LSMC.DE is Semiconductors. 2B7A.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Utilities, while LSMC.DE tracks MSCI ACWI Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment ESG Filtered NET USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 2B7A.DE and 0.45% for LSMC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7A.DE and LSMC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer