PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2B7A.DE is traded in EUR, while ^NDX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^NDX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2B7A.DE achieves a 3.01% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's 21.80% return.


2B7A.DE

1D
-2.24%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
3.01%
6M
1.01%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*

^NDX

1D
0.00%
1M
7.55%
YTD
21.80%
6M
18.63%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
2B7A.DE
iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc
3.01%4.72%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
16.93%12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between 2B7A.DE and ^NDX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2B7A.DE
2B7A.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
2B7A.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7A.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Utilities Sector UCITS ETF USD Acc (2B7A.DE) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2B7A.DE^NDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.49

2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2B7A.DE^NDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

2.30

-1.87

Drawdowns

2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2B7A.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.70%, which is greater than ^NDX's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B7A.DE and ^NDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2B7A.DE^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.70%

-11.19%

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.77%

-0.69%

-8.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.03%

-2.54%

-7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.48%

Volatility

2B7A.DE vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2B7A.DE^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.74%

16.28%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

16.28%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.65%

16.28%

+3.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


2B7A.DE and ^NDX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2B7A.DE and ^NDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer