2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE
2B77.DE (iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF) and CIB0.DE (VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - 2B77.DE tracks the iSTOXX® FactSet Ageing Population while CIB0.DE tracks the MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, 2B77.DE returned 10.94%/yr vs -8.20%/yr for CIB0.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2B77.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CIB0.DE.
Performance
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B77.DE achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than CIB0.DE's -14.18% return.
2B77.DE
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 16.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- —
CIB0.DE
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -14.18%
- 6M
- -17.46%
- 1Y
- -15.36%
- 3Y*
- -8.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B77.DE iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF | 2.83% | 13.27% | 14.30% | 5.16% | -2.64% |
CIB0.DE VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A | -14.18% | -10.00% | 5.16% | 2.09% | -1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B77.DE and CIB0.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between 2B77.DE and CIB0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
2B77.DE
CIB0.DE
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) and VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B77.DE | CIB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 0.87 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | -0.65 | +3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | -1.67 | +9.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B77.DE | CIB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | -0.89 | +2.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.31 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B77.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.47%, which is greater than CIB0.DE's maximum drawdown of -32.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B77.DE and CIB0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B77.DE | CIB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.47% | -32.60% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.80% | -23.47% | +16.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -32.60% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -28.26% | +26.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -10.72% | +5.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 9.08% | -7.07% |
Volatility
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) is 3.36%, while VanEck Bionic Engineering UCITS ETF A (CIB0.DE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that 2B77.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIB0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B77.DE | CIB0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 6.42% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 12.62% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 17.03% | -4.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.09% | 17.95% | -2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 17.95% | -1.43% |
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B77.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CIB0.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
2B77.DE vs. CIB0.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B77.DE nor CIB0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B77.DE and CIB0.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2B77.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2B77.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CIB0.DE.
2B77.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Ageing Population, while CIB0.DE tracks MVIS Global Bionic Healthcare ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B77.DE and 0.55% for CIB0.DE.
Find the right allocation for 2B77.DE and CIB0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer