2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L
2B76.DE (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) and XMMS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - 2B76.DE is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while XMMS.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2B76.DE returned 11.74%/yr vs 8.31%/yr for XMMS.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2B76.DE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XMMS.L.
Performance
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
2B76.DE is traded in EUR, while XMMS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMMS.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2B76.DE achieves a 29.76% return, which is significantly higher than XMMS.L's 27.85% return.
2B76.DE
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 8.53%
- YTD
- 29.76%
- 6M
- 27.19%
- 1Y
- 43.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- —
XMMS.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 6.13%
- YTD
- 27.85%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 49.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- —
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2B76.DE iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 29.76% | 4.57% | 12.11% | 34.96% | -31.03% | 32.27% | 26.14% | 41.97% | -19.25% |
XMMS.L Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C | 27.85% | 18.21% | 14.39% | 4.84% | -15.15% | 4.79% | 8.40% | 20.62% | -11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2B76.DE and XMMS.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2018 | 0.64 |
The correlation between 2B76.DE and XMMS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
2B76.DE
XMMS.L
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2B76.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.51 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 4.54 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 16.48 | -12.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2B76.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 2.81 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.50 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.44 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2B76.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.52%, which is greater than XMMS.L's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2B76.DE and XMMS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2B76.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.52% | -32.14% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.42% | -10.88% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -17.86% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.52% | -24.50% | -11.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.54% | -2.59% | +2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -9.42% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 3.01% | +8.00% |
Volatility
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (2B76.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C (XMMS.L) have volatilities of 7.32% and 7.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2B76.DE | XMMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.32% | 7.49% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.05% | 14.74% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.98% | 17.64% | +13.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 17.10% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.52% | 19.40% | +3.12% |
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
2B76.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMS.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
2B76.DE vs. XMMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2B76.DE nor XMMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2B76.DE and XMMS.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XMMS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XMMS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 2B76.DE.
2B76.DE is categorized as Robotics, while XMMS.L is Emerging Markets Equities. 2B76.DE tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics, while XMMS.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for 2B76.DE and 0.18% for XMMS.L.
Find the right allocation for 2B76.DE and XMMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer