2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L
2AMZ.L (Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP) and 3NFL.L (Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - 2AMZ.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x AMZN Index while 3NFL.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NFLX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 2AMZ.L returned -0.23%/yr vs 24.98%/yr for 3NFL.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2AMZ.L achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than 3NFL.L's -47.38% return.
2AMZ.L
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 11.83%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 29.23%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- —
3NFL.L
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -20.88%
- YTD
- -47.38%
- 6M
- -59.18%
- 1Y
- -83.36%
- 3Y*
- 411.74%
- 5Y*
- 24.98%
- 10Y*
- —
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2AMZ.L Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP | 11.22% | -18.82% | 83.06% | 165.76% | -80.00% | 0.95% | 49.72% |
3NFL.L Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities GBP | -47.38% | -39.94% | 323.42% | 22,926.07% | -99.45% | 15.85% | 30.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2AMZ.L and 3NFL.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020 | 0.45 |
The correlation between 2AMZ.L and 3NFL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
2AMZ.L
3NFL.L
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
2AMZ.L
3NFL.L
-
Basic Materials
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Communication Services
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
Consumer Defensive
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Energy
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Financial Services
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Healthcare
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Industrials
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Real Estate
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Technology
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Utilities
2AMZ.L
-
3NFL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L — Risk / Return Rank
2AMZ.L
3NFL.L
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities GBP (3NFL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2AMZ.L | 3NFL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.77 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | -0.97 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.01 | -1.41 | +2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2AMZ.L | 3NFL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | -0.88 | +1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 | 0.01 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.01 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2AMZ.L drawdown since its inception was -84.20%, smaller than the maximum 3NFL.L drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2AMZ.L and 3NFL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2AMZ.L | 3NFL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.20% | -99.86% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.87% | -86.21% | +41.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.29% | -86.21% | +30.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.20% | -99.85% | +15.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.80% | -85.44% | +56.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -52.05% | +15.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.15% | 59.35% | -39.20% |
Volatility
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2x Amazon ETC A GBP (2AMZ.L) is 17.93%, while Leverage Shares 3x Netflix ETP Securities GBP (3NFL.L) has a volatility of 22.80%. This indicates that 2AMZ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3NFL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2AMZ.L | 3NFL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.93% | 22.80% | -4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.46% | 78.70% | -32.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.33% | 94.78% | -34.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 3,346.20% | -3,277.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.46% | 3,054.15% | -2,986.69% |
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both 2AMZ.L and 3NFL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
2AMZ.L vs. 3NFL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither 2AMZ.L nor 3NFL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
2AMZ.L and 3NFL.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2AMZ.L and 3NFL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
2AMZ.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x AMZN Index, while 3NFL.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NFLX Index.
Find the right allocation for 2AMZ.L and 3NFL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer