2800.HK vs. 3145.HK
2800.HK (Tracker Fund of Hong Kong) and 3145.HK (ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 2800.HK is a China Equities fund tracking the Hang Seng Index, while 3145.HK is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg APAC High Dividend 40 Net Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, 2800.HK returned 4.65%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for 3145.HK. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 2800.HK charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for 3145.HK.
Performance
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2800.HK achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than 3145.HK's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, 2800.HK has underperformed 3145.HK with an annualized return of 4.65%, while 3145.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 10.34% annualized return.
2800.HK
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- 6M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.65%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.82%
3145.HK
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 20.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong | HK$19.24B | HK$19.19B | HK$19.22B |
| HK$14.01M | HK$20.09M | HK$17.30M |
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong | -1.14% | 31.39% | 22.40% | -10.55% | -11.90% | -11.96% | -0.75% | 12.96% | -10.08% | 40.54% |
3145.HK ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF | 12.74% | 22.59% | 17.17% | 11.62% | -11.17% | 6.94% | 3.52% | 19.78% | -8.87% | 39.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2800.HK and 3145.HK is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2014 | 0.65 |
The correlation between 2800.HK and 3145.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK — Risk / Return Rank
2800.HK
3145.HK
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK) and ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF (3145.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 2800.HK | 3145.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 1.84 | -1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 5.31 | -5.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2800.HK drawdown since its inception was -63.92%, which is greater than 3145.HK's maximum drawdown of -34.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2800.HK and 3145.HK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2800.HK | 3145.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.92% | -34.05% | -29.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.49% | -11.45% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.13% | -18.46% | -5.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.50% | -28.22% | -15.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.39% | -34.05% | -15.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.42% | -4.21% | -5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.69% | -8.03% | -14.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.61% | 3.92% | +2.69% |
Volatility
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK - Volatility Comparison
Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF (3145.HK) at 4.79%. This indicates that 2800.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 3145.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 2800.HK | 3145.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.35% | 4.79% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 11.72% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.00% | 14.59% | +4.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 15.42% | +9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 15.53% | +5.86% |
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK - Expense Ratio Comparison
2800.HK has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than 3145.HK's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
2800.HK vs. 3145.HK - Dividend Comparison
2800.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than 3145.HK's 7.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2800.HK Tracker Fund of Hong Kong | 2.92% | 2.98% | 3.80% | 3.78% | 3.21% | 2.85% | 2.74% | 3.27% | 3.65% | 3.09% | 3.53% | 3.67% |
3145.HK ChinaAMC Asia High Dividend ETF | 7.79% | 3.82% | 2.51% | 2.87% | 3.00% | 2.68% | 2.79% | 2.22% | 2.82% | 2.00% | 2.94% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
2800.HK and 3145.HK have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 2800.HK is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
2800.HK is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for 3145.HK.
2800.HK is categorized as China Equities, while 3145.HK is Asia Pacific Equities. 2800.HK tracks Hang Seng Index, while 3145.HK tracks Bloomberg APAC High Dividend 40 Net Return Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ChinaAMC. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for 2800.HK and 0.45% for 3145.HK.
Find the right allocation for 2800.HK and 3145.HK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer