2378.HK vs. NVDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Prudential PLC (2378.HK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA).
Performance
2378.HK vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Different Trading Currencies
2378.HK is traded in HKD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2378.HK achieves a -5.72% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, 2378.HK has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 1.65%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 70.25% annualized return.
2378.HK
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- -5.72%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- 1Y
- 36.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -5.66%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -4.75%
- 1Y
- 75.65%
- 3Y*
- 85.08%
- 5Y*
- 66.98%
- 10Y*
- 70.25%
2378.HK vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2378.HK Prudential PLC | -5.72% | 97.15% | -27.55% | -19.09% | -16.35% | -3.99% | -0.09% | 30.24% | -27.68% | 31.04% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | -4.21% | 39.18% | 169.85% | 238.98% | -50.18% | 126.71% | 121.30% | 76.01% | -30.66% | 83.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between 2378.HK and NVDA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. They neither move together nor in opposition — each responds to its own set of market drivers. This independence makes them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2378.HK vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
2378.HK
NVDA
2378.HK vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential PLC (2378.HK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2378.HK | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 2.19 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 3.19 | -0.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.97 | 7.84 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2378.HK | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.16 | 1.30 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 1.41 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.75 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
2378.HK vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2378.HK drawdown since its inception was -64.18%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2378.HK and NVDA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2378.HK | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.18% | -89.72% | +25.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.25% | -20.21% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.18% | -66.34% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.18% | -66.34% | +2.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.25% | -14.31% | -13.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.87% | -36.39% | +13.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.67% | 8.10% | -2.43% |
Volatility
2378.HK vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Prudential PLC (2378.HK) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.27%. This indicates that 2378.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 2378.HK | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.38% | 10.27% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.59% | 25.77% | -3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.19% | 41.38% | -8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.67% | 51.69% | -16.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 49.82% | -14.06% |
Dividends
2378.HK vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
2378.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2378.HK Prudential PLC | 1.87% | 1.54% | 2.68% | 1.73% | 1.32% | 0.90% | 1.66% | 2.90% | 3.74% | 2.26% | 1.58% | 2.48% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
2378.HK vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential PLC and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities