PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2378.HK vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Prudential PLC (2378.HK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Different Trading Currencies

2378.HK is traded in HKD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2378.HK achieves a -5.72% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, 2378.HK has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 1.65%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 70.25% annualized return.


2378.HK

1D
-0.63%
1M
0.60%
YTD
-5.72%
6M
5.50%
1Y
36.45%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
-5.66%
10Y*
1.65%

NVDA

1D
0.94%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-4.75%
1Y
75.65%
3Y*
85.08%
5Y*
66.98%
10Y*
70.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2378.HK
Prudential PLC
-5.72%97.15%-27.55%-19.09%-16.35%-3.99%-0.09%30.24%-27.68%31.04%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
-4.21%39.18%169.85%238.98%-50.18%126.71%121.30%76.01%-30.66%83.39%

Correlation

The correlation between 2378.HK and NVDA is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. They neither move together nor in opposition — each responds to its own set of market drivers. This independence makes them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2378.HK vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2378.HK
2378.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
2378.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2378.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
2378.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
2378.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
2378.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential PLC (2378.HK) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2378.HKNVDADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

1.50

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

2.19

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.28

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.19

-0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.97

7.84

-0.87

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2378.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2378.HK and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2378.HKNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

1.50

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

1.30

-1.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

1.41

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.75

-0.47

Drawdowns

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2378.HK drawdown since its inception was -64.18%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2378.HK and NVDA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


2378.HKNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.18%

-89.72%

+25.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

-20.21%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.18%

-66.34%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.18%

-66.34%

+2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.25%

-14.31%

-13.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.87%

-36.39%

+13.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.67%

8.10%

-2.43%

Volatility

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Prudential PLC (2378.HK) has a higher volatility of 12.38% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 10.27%. This indicates that 2378.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


2378.HKNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.38%

10.27%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.59%

25.77%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.19%

41.38%

-8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.67%

51.69%

-16.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.76%

49.82%

-14.06%

Dividends

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

2378.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than NVDA's 0.02% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2378.HK
Prudential PLC
1.87%1.54%2.68%1.73%1.32%0.90%1.66%2.90%3.74%2.26%1.58%2.48%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

2378.HK vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Prudential PLC and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 2378.HK values in HKD, NVDA values in USD