PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2357.HK vs. 0696.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in AviChina Industry & Technology Co Ltd (2357.HK) and TravelSky Technology Ltd (0696.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2357.HK achieves a -18.77% return, which is significantly lower than 0696.HK's -12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, 2357.HK has outperformed 0696.HK with an annualized return of -3.71%, while 0696.HK has yielded a comparatively lower -4.33% annualized return.


2357.HK

1D
-0.63%
1M
-8.12%
YTD
-18.77%
6M
-19.98%
1Y
-19.38%
3Y*
-4.60%
5Y*
-6.81%
10Y*
-3.71%

0696.HK

1D
-1.10%
1M
-9.08%
YTD
-12.35%
6M
-15.95%
1Y
-18.43%
3Y*
-14.65%
5Y*
-10.93%
10Y*
-4.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2357.HK
AviChina Industry & Technology Co Ltd
-18.77%5.20%18.29%-2.41%-33.50%0.78%55.63%-28.12%19.21%-21.75%
0696.HK
TravelSky Technology Ltd
-12.35%1.30%-21.55%-17.86%26.36%-29.76%0.47%-3.32%-13.34%45.48%

Correlation

The correlation between 2357.HK and 0696.HK is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2003

0.29

The correlation between 2357.HK and 0696.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TravelSky Technology Ltd

Often compared with 2357.HK:
2357.HK vs. 1316.HK
Often compared with 0696.HK:
0696.HK vs. 1316.HK

Return for Risk

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2357.HK
2357.HK Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
2357.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2357.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
2357.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
2357.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
2357.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

0696.HK
0696.HK Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
0696.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0696.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
0696.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
0696.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
0696.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AviChina Industry & Technology Co Ltd (2357.HK) and TravelSky Technology Ltd (0696.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


2357.HK0696.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.91

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.58

-0.57

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

-0.99

-0.10

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2357.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is comparable to the 0696.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2357.HK and 0696.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


2357.HK0696.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.61

-0.63

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.27

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

-0.11

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.23

-0.14

Drawdowns

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2357.HK drawdown since its inception was -81.89%, roughly equal to the maximum 0696.HK drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2357.HK and 0696.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2357.HK0696.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.89%

-80.08%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.00%

-30.37%

-4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.96%

-51.31%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.64%

-58.45%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.58%

-70.53%

+7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.03%

-62.81%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.73%

-28.02%

-15.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.63%

17.36%

+1.27%

Volatility

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AviChina Industry & Technology Co Ltd (2357.HK) is 5.99%, while TravelSky Technology Ltd (0696.HK) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that 2357.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0696.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2357.HK0696.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

6.36%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.62%

19.78%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.49%

27.73%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.11%

41.64%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.86%

39.21%

+1.65%

Dividends

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Dividend Comparison

2357.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than 0696.HK's 2.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0696.HK
TravelSky Technology Ltd
2.90%2.54%1.69%0.43%0.39%0.15%1.69%1.61%1.52%1.08%1.20%1.32%
2357.HK
AviChina Industry & Technology Co Ltd
2.42%2.21%2.51%2.69%2.68%1.12%0.61%0.98%0.73%0.54%0.44%0.42%

Financials

2357.HK vs. 0696.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AviChina Industry & Technology Co Ltd and TravelSky Technology Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


2357.HK and 0696.HK have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2357.HK and 0696.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer