2318.HK vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
2318.HK vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
2318.HK vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2318.HK Ping An Insurance | -6.98% | 49.26% | 39.82% | -27.80% | -2.29% | -38.64% | 6.30% | 36.50% | -12.57% | 114.12% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -8.34% | 18.68% | 32.51% | 42.66% | -29.06% | 28.29% | 37.68% | 35.34% | -1.32% | 31.05% |
Different Trading Currencies
2318.HK is traded in HKD, while VONG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VONG values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 2318.HK achieves a -6.98% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's -8.34% return. Over the past 10 years, 2318.HK has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 9.58%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.88% annualized return.
2318.HK
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -6.98%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 36.46%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- -3.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.58%
VONG
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -8.34%
- 6M
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- 19.57%
- 3Y*
- 21.40%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 16.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
2318.HK vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
2318.HK
VONG
2318.HK vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 2318.HK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.88 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.41 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.34 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.12 | 4.53 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 2318.HK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.88 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.60 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.81 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.85 | -0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between 2318.HK and VONG is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
2318.HK vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
2318.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2318.HK Ping An Insurance | 4.63% | 4.30% | 5.79% | 7.68% | 5.55% | 4.86% | 2.44% | 2.30% | 3.16% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.98% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
2318.HK vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 2318.HK drawdown since its inception was -79.19%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2318.HK and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 2318.HK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.19% | -32.72% | -46.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.72% | -16.23% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.01% | -32.72% | -30.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.38% | -32.72% | -33.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.49% | -12.29% | -10.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.62% | -4.90% | -25.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 4.78% | +1.57% |
Volatility
2318.HK vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.80%. This indicates that 2318.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 2318.HK | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.00% | 6.80% | +4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.17% | 12.33% | +9.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.59% | 22.39% | +9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.37% | 21.33% | +19.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.16% | 20.78% | +12.38% |