PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2318.HK vs. 3690.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) and Meituan (3690.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2318.HK achieves a -9.25% return, which is significantly higher than 3690.HK's -24.59% return.


2318.HK

1D
0.53%
1M
-7.76%
YTD
-9.25%
6M
-7.25%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
9.47%
5Y*
-1.11%
10Y*
9.85%

3690.HK

1D
-0.26%
1M
-11.07%
YTD
-24.59%
6M
-23.93%
1Y
-44.75%
3Y*
-15.26%
5Y*
-24.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
2318.HK
Ping An Insurance
-9.25%49.42%39.68%-27.80%-2.29%-38.58%6.19%36.50%-10.37%
3690.HK
Meituan
-24.59%-31.91%85.23%-53.12%-22.49%-23.33%188.52%132.12%-39.78%

Correlation

The correlation between 2318.HK and 3690.HK is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.48

The correlation between 2318.HK and 3690.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.60 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2318.HK
2318.HK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
2318.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2318.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
2318.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
2318.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
2318.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

3690.HK
3690.HK Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
3690.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3690.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
3690.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
3690.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
3690.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) and Meituan (3690.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2318.HK3690.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.79

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.96

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

-1.49

+4.14

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2318.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the 3690.HK Sharpe Ratio of -1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2318.HK and 3690.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2318.HK drawdown since its inception was -78.96%, smaller than the maximum 3690.HK drawdown of -86.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2318.HK and 3690.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2318.HK3690.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.96%

-86.14%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.72%

-47.19%

+25.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.88%

-65.65%

+19.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.96%

-81.05%

+23.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.37%

-82.74%

+58.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.37%

-48.79%

+18.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.19%

34.25%

-25.06%

Volatility

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ping An Insurance (2318.HK) is 3.60%, while Meituan (3690.HK) has a volatility of 16.38%. This indicates that 2318.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3690.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2318.HK3690.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

16.38%

-12.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.35%

31.00%

-8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.62%

40.79%

-12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.50%

57.93%

-17.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.15%

57.16%

-24.01%

Dividends

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Dividend Comparison

2318.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, while 3690.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
2318.HK
Ping An Insurance
5.34%4.30%5.80%7.68%5.55%4.86%2.44%2.30%1.38%1.50%1.67%1.24%
3690.HK
Meituan
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

2318.HK vs. 3690.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ping An Insurance and Meituan. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


2318.HK and 3690.HK have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2318.HK and 3690.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer