2039.HK vs. RPRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

2039.HK (China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd) and RPRX (Royalty Pharma plc) are both stocks. 2039.HK operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while RPRX operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, 2039.HK returned 5.03%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for RPRX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

2039.HK vs. RPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd (2039.HK) and Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

2039.HK is traded in HKD, while RPRX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RPRX values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 2039.HK achieves a -0.75% return, which is significantly lower than RPRX's 46.94% return.

2039.HK

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: -20.89%
• YTD: -0.75%
• 6M: 9.95%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 28.02%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

RPRX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: 10.62%
• YTD: 46.94%
• 6M: 42.89%
• 1Y: 68.83%
• 3Y*: 21.31%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2039.HK vs. RPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
2039.HK China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd	-0.75%	85.40%	8.64%	-11.71%	-23.11%	26.69%	88.02%
RPRX Royalty Pharma plc	46.94%	55.59%	-6.85%	-27.09%	1.16%	-18.65%	13.38%

Correlation

The correlation between 2039.HK and RPRX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2020	0.01

Return for Risk

2039.HK vs. RPRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2039.HK

2039.HK Risk / Return Rank: 77
2039.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
2039.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
2039.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 76
2039.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
2039.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 78

RPRX

RPRX Risk / Return Rank: 96
RPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
RPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
RPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
RPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2039.HK vs. RPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd (2039.HK) and Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	2039.HK	RPRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	3.17	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.96	-1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.53	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	8.47	-6.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.85	21.91	-16.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

2039.HK vs. RPRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2039.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the RPRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2039.HK and RPRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	2039.HK	RPRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.28	3.17	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	0.29	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.24	-0.06

Drawdowns

2039.HK vs. RPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2039.HK drawdown since its inception was -69.13%, which is greater than RPRX's maximum drawdown of -49.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2039.HK and RPRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	2039.HK	RPRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.13%	-49.57%	-19.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.58%	-8.17%	-20.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-46.26%	-27.09%	-19.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.08%	-43.37%	-15.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.52%	0.00%	-26.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.76%	-25.98%	-9.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.09%	3.15%	+7.94%

Volatility

2039.HK vs. RPRX - Volatility Comparison

China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd (2039.HK) has a higher volatility of 18.67% compared to Royalty Pharma plc (RPRX) at 6.21%. This indicates that 2039.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	2039.HK	RPRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.67%	6.21%	+12.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.13%	14.04%	+29.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.62%	21.82%	+29.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.70%	23.88%	+18.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.93%	26.87%	+14.06%

Dividends

2039.HK vs. RPRX - Dividend Comparison

2039.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
2039.HK China International Marine Containers Group Co Ltd	0.00%	4.09%	0.45%	3.91%	32.12%	2.43%	1.16%	10.34%	4.40%	0.46%	2.32%	2.77%
RPRX Royalty Pharma plc	1.63%	2.28%	3.29%	2.85%	1.92%	1.71%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 2039.HK and RPRX in my portfolio?

2039.HK and RPRX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.