PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1929.HK vs. 9988.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd (1929.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1929.HK achieves a -7.59% return, which is significantly higher than 9988.HK's -13.52% return.


1929.HK

1D
0.17%
1M
5.63%
YTD
-7.59%
6M
-16.28%
1Y
0.06%
3Y*
-1.84%
5Y*
-0.78%
10Y*
11.80%

9988.HK

1D
-2.45%
1M
-7.97%
YTD
-13.52%
6M
-20.32%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
-9.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
1929.HK
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd
-7.59%90.93%-37.54%-23.78%17.33%48.31%34.95%10.94%
9988.HK
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
-13.52%73.87%11.01%-11.14%-27.46%-48.79%12.07%10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between 1929.HK and 9988.HK is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2019

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1929.HK
1929.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
1929.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1929.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
1929.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
1929.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
1929.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

9988.HK
9988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
9988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
9988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
9988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
9988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
9988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd (1929.HK) and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1929.HK9988.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.00

0.25

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.00

0.48

-0.48

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1929.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the 9988.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1929.HK and 9988.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1929.HK9988.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

0.19

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.19

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

-0.12

+0.18

Drawdowns

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1929.HK drawdown since its inception was -68.90%, smaller than the maximum 9988.HK drawdown of -80.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1929.HK and 9988.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1929.HK9988.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.90%

-80.01%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.66%

-35.98%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.63%

-35.98%

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.70%

-72.32%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.97%

-58.38%

+28.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.32%

-51.96%

+20.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.36%

18.31%

+0.05%

Volatility

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd (1929.HK) is 11.98%, while Alibaba Group Holding Ltd (9988.HK) has a volatility of 13.41%. This indicates that 1929.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 9988.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1929.HK9988.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.98%

13.41%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.16%

30.16%

-3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.90%

46.39%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.11%

51.96%

-8.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.01%

49.36%

-10.35%

Dividends

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Dividend Comparison

1929.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than 9988.HK's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1929.HK
Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd
4.72%4.36%7.40%4.56%3.14%3.28%2.87%4.30%6.89%2.68%2.36%4.60%
9988.HK
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
0.83%0.72%1.18%1.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

1929.HK vs. 9988.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chow Tai Fook Jewellery Group Ltd and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


1929.HK and 9988.HK have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1929.HK and 9988.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer