18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE
18MK.DE (Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF EUR) and LVWC.DE (Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - 18MK.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India, while LVWC.DE is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Leveraged 2x Daily Net Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 18MK.DE charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LVWC.DE.
Performance
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 18MK.DE achieves a -11.57% return, which is significantly lower than LVWC.DE's 17.92% return.
18MK.DE
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- -11.57%
- 6M
- -13.20%
- 1Y
- -15.27%
- 3Y*
- 1.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.21%
LVWC.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 17.92%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
18MK.DE Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF EUR | -11.57% | -0.21% |
LVWC.DE Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF | 17.92% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between 18MK.DE and LVWC.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
18MK.DE
LVWC.DE
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India UCITS ETF EUR (18MK.DE) and Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 18MK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 18MK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.44 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 18MK.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than LVWC.DE's maximum drawdown of -14.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18MK.DE and LVWC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 18MK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.41% | -14.47% | -27.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.69% | -0.89% | -25.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.59% | -2.96% | -9.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.60% | — | — |
Volatility
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 18MK.DE | LVWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.99% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 24.20% | -7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 24.20% | -7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.29% | 24.20% | -3.91% |
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
18MK.DE has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than LVWC.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
18MK.DE vs. LVWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither 18MK.DE nor LVWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
18MK.DE and LVWC.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVWC.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVWC.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for 18MK.DE.
18MK.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while LVWC.DE is Leveraged Equities. 18MK.DE tracks MSCI India, while LVWC.DE tracks MSCI World Leveraged 2x Daily Net Index. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for 18MK.DE and 0.60% for LVWC.DE.
Find the right allocation for 18MK.DE and LVWC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer