PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (18M2.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 18M2.DE achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return. Over the past 10 years, 18M2.DE has underperformed LYMS.DE with an annualized return of 8.26%, while LYMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.41% annualized return.


18M2.DE

1D
0.32%
1M
1.10%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.84%
1Y
15.86%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
8.26%

LYMS.DE

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.25%
YTD
20.63%
6M
19.42%
1Y
37.94%
3Y*
24.71%
5Y*
18.88%
10Y*
21.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
18M2.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR
6.76%21.49%3.36%16.14%-6.47%16.02%-6.39%24.91%-4.44%7.99%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
20.63%7.15%33.72%51.52%-29.87%39.59%34.60%42.84%3.18%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between 18M2.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2010

0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between 18M2.DE and LYMS.DE has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

18M2.DE
18M2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
18M2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
18M2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
18M2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
18M2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
18M2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

LYMS.DE
LYMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (18M2.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


18M2.DELYMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

3.77

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.71

11.23

-4.52

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 18M2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the LYMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 18M2.DE and LYMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


18M2.DELYMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.40

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.94

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

1.08

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.77

-0.33

Drawdowns

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 18M2.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.06%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18M2.DE and LYMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


18M2.DELYMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.06%

-50.00%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-10.02%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.68%

-26.74%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.81%

-31.12%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.06%

-31.12%

-5.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.86%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-8.78%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

3.37%

-1.01%

Volatility

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR (18M2.DE) is 2.63%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that 18M2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


18M2.DELYMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

4.37%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

10.99%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

15.73%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.41%

19.91%

-6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.44%

19.68%

-4.24%

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

18M2.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

18M2.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 18M2.DE nor LYMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
18M2.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU High Dividend UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYMS.DE
Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.65%0.69%0.76%1.09%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


18M2.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for 18M2.DE.

18M2.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while LYMS.DE is Nasdaq-100. 18M2.DE tracks MSCI EMU High Dividend Yield, while LYMS.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for 18M2.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 18M2.DE and LYMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer