PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Euro Government Bond 0-6 M UCITS ETF (Acc) (18M1.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 18M1.DE achieves a 1.00% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7S.DE's -0.20% return.


18M1.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
0.21%
6M
0.92%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
1.87%
3Y*
2.79%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
0.52%

2B7S.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
6M
-0.20%
YTD
-0.20%
1Y
1.20%
3Y*
2.48%
5Y*
0.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
18M1.DE
Amundi Euro Government Bond 0-6 M UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.00%2.05%3.53%2.89%-0.42%-0.57%
2B7S.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
-0.20%3.04%2.49%1.90%-5.78%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 18M1.DE and 2B7S.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

18M1.DE
18M1.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
18M1.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
18M1.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
18M1.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
18M1.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
18M1.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7S.DE
2B7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Euro Government Bond 0-6 M UCITS ETF (Acc) (18M1.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


18M1.DE2B7S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.28

1.11

+1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

28.91

1.22

+27.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

103.56

3.01

+100.55

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 18M1.DE Sharpe Ratio is 5.00, which is higher than the 2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 18M1.DE and 2B7S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 18M1.DE drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum 2B7S.DE drawdown of -7.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 18M1.DE and 2B7S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


18M1.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-7.68%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

-0.98%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.13%

-1.03%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.02%

-7.50%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.59%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.38%

-3.25%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

0.40%

-0.38%

Volatility

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Euro Government Bond 0-6 M UCITS ETF (Acc) (18M1.DE) is 0.06%, while iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) has a volatility of 0.57%. This indicates that 18M1.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


18M1.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

0.57%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.28%

1.99%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37%

2.50%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.39%

2.51%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.48%

2.45%

-1.97%

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

18M1.DE has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B7S.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

18M1.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 18M1.DE nor 2B7S.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


18M1.DE and 2B7S.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 2B7S.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

2B7S.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for 18M1.DE.

18M1.DE tracks FTSE Eurozone Government Bill 0-6 Month Capped Index, while 2B7S.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 18M1.DE and 0.10% for 2B7S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 18M1.DE and 2B7S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer