PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
1339.HK vs. 1378.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in People’s Insurance Group of China Co Ltd (1339.HK) and China Hongqiao Group Ltd (1378.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 1339.HK achieves a -25.04% return, which is significantly lower than 1378.HK's -11.58% return. Over the past 10 years, 1339.HK has underperformed 1378.HK with an annualized return of 9.58%, while 1378.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.86% annualized return.


1339.HK

1D
-0.39%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
-25.04%
6M
-27.82%
1Y
-2.39%
3Y*
26.65%
5Y*
19.13%
10Y*
9.58%

1378.HK

1D
-5.21%
1M
-14.06%
YTD
-11.58%
6M
-14.52%
1Y
103.39%
3Y*
79.05%
5Y*
31.29%
10Y*
25.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
1339.HK
People’s Insurance Group of China Co Ltd
-25.04%78.96%76.53%-1.31%17.66%2.13%-18.43%4.63%-17.06%27.31%
1378.HK
China Hongqiao Group Ltd
-11.58%197.19%97.56%-7.65%1.64%27.75%70.62%10.34%-45.64%28.30%

Correlation

The correlation between 1339.HK and 1378.HK is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2012

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

1339.HK
1339.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
1339.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1339.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
1339.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
1339.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
1339.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

1378.HK
1378.HK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
1378.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
1378.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
1378.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
1378.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
1378.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for People’s Insurance Group of China Co Ltd (1339.HK) and China Hongqiao Group Ltd (1378.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


1339.HK1378.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.31

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

3.70

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

11.33

-11.44

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 1339.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the 1378.HK Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 1339.HK and 1378.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


1339.HK1378.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

2.18

-2.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.68

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.57

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.35

-0.16

Drawdowns

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 1339.HK drawdown since its inception was -61.40%, smaller than the maximum 1378.HK drawdown of -74.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 1339.HK and 1378.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


1339.HK1378.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.40%

-74.60%

+13.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.89%

-28.29%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.89%

-33.45%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-54.83%

+21.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.90%

-74.60%

+20.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.89%

-28.29%

-4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.18%

-30.92%

-3.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.24%

9.12%

+5.12%

Volatility

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for People’s Insurance Group of China Co Ltd (1339.HK) is 10.59%, while China Hongqiao Group Ltd (1378.HK) has a volatility of 13.11%. This indicates that 1339.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 1378.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


1339.HK1378.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

13.11%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.82%

35.08%

-9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.05%

47.95%

-12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.66%

47.66%

-17.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.05%

46.46%

-17.41%

Dividends

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Dividend Comparison

1339.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than 1378.HK's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
1339.HK
People’s Insurance Group of China Co Ltd
4.16%3.12%6.13%7.58%6.63%7.04%6.85%1.60%1.56%1.01%0.87%0.31%
1378.HK
China Hongqiao Group Ltd
6.04%3.13%7.48%6.89%13.70%11.54%6.90%5.11%15.06%0.00%2.20%6.07%

Financials

1339.HK vs. 1378.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between People’s Insurance Group of China Co Ltd and China Hongqiao Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


1339.HK and 1378.HK have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 1339.HK and 1378.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer