PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (10AI.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 10AI.DE achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return.


10AI.DE

1D
0.60%
1M
3.33%
YTD
7.51%
6M
9.77%
1Y
16.07%
3Y*
13.61%
5Y*
9.90%
10Y*

CEMS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
4.58%
YTD
13.72%
6M
16.86%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
10AI.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
7.51%20.22%8.28%15.64%-9.34%25.18%-3.49%30.37%-11.21%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
13.72%35.97%9.93%13.90%-4.54%26.62%-8.86%23.48%-13.50%

Correlation

The correlation between 10AI.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018

0.83

The correlation between 10AI.DE and CEMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

10AI.DE
10AI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
10AI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
10AI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
10AI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
10AI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
10AI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (10AI.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


10AI.DECEMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

3.29

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.28

12.37

-6.08

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 10AI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 10AI.DE and CEMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


10AI.DECEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.37

-1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.94

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.49

+0.12

Drawdowns

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 10AI.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.68%, smaller than the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 10AI.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


10AI.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.68%

-40.20%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.45%

-9.99%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.63%

-17.57%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.53%

-19.55%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.26%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-7.49%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.66%

-0.11%

Volatility

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D) (10AI.DE) is 4.22%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that 10AI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


10AI.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.22%

4.65%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.60%

11.17%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

13.87%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

15.23%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

17.43%

-0.37%

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

10AI.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

10AI.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

10AI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, while CEMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
10AI.DE
Amundi Index MSCI Europe UCITS ETF DR EUR (D)
2.34%2.51%2.82%2.77%3.02%2.17%2.07%3.17%3.21%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, 10AI.DE and CEMS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 10AI.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

10AI.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

10AI.DE tracks MSCI Europe, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 10AI.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 10AI.DE and CEMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer