100D.L vs. MIBX.L

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

100D.L (Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - 100D.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 100D.L returned 11.96%/yr vs 20.55%/yr for MIBX.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. 100D.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MIBX.L.

Performance

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 100D.L achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 17.04% return.

100D.L

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 8.09%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

MIBX.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 17.04%
• 6M: 17.60%
• 1Y: 38.44%
• 3Y*: 29.72%
• 5Y*: 20.55%
• 10Y*: 17.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	8.09%	25.77%	9.32%	7.37%	4.80%	18.00%	-11.78%	17.23%	-8.88%	3.11%
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	17.04%	43.78%	13.17%	30.61%	-3.53%	18.16%	1.49%	25.15%	-12.72%	-3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between 100D.L and MIBX.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017	0.70

The correlation between 100D.L and MIBX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	100D.L	MIBX.L
Financial Services	24.5%	45.3%
Consumer Defensive	13.9%	0.4%
Industrials	13.7%	11.4%
Healthcare	13.6%	1.2%
Energy	11.7%	7.9%
Basic Materials	8.5%	0.5%
Utilities	5.3%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	9.9%
Communication Services	2.6%	1.7%
Real Estate	0.9%	0.3%
Technology	0.8%	5.5%

Return for Risk

100D.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

100D.L

100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 80
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

MIBX.L

MIBX.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MIBX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MIBX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MIBX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
MIBX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	100D.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.54	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	3.41	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.44	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	3.73	-0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.90	13.56	-4.66

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 100D.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the MIBX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 100D.L and MIBX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 100D.L drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -67.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 100D.L and MIBX.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	100D.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.63%	-67.93%	+33.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-10.26%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.06%	-15.64%	+2.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.06%	-24.06%	+11.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-2.69%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-39.84%	+34.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.83%	-0.07%

Volatility

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) is 3.01%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that 100D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	100D.L	MIBX.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.01%	3.85%	-0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	12.39%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.20%	15.10%	-3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.87%	17.95%	-5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.33%	18.93%	-3.60%

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

100D.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

100D.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison

100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than MIBX.L's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	3.50%	3.78%	4.17%	3.90%	3.80%	3.39%	3.11%	4.30%	4.62%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist	3.15%	3.68%	3.93%	3.73%	3.88%	2.09%	1.55%	4.02%	4.05%	2.75%	3.56%	3.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 100D.L and MIBX.L in my portfolio?

100D.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 100D.L or MIBX.L?

On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 100D.L or MIBX.L?

100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.

What is the main difference between 100D.L and MIBX.L?

100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 100D.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.