100D.L vs. CNAA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

100D.L (Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF) and CNAA.L (Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR) are both exchange-traded funds - 100D.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while CNAA.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, 100D.L returned 11.78%/yr vs -0.07%/yr for CNAA.L. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. 100D.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CNAA.L.

Performance

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

100D.L is traded in GBp, while CNAA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CNAA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 100D.L achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than CNAA.L's 9.32% return.

100D.L

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.44%
• YTD: 6.04%
• 6M: 8.85%
• 1Y: 21.22%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: —

CNAA.L

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 12.02%
• 1Y: 37.60%
• 3Y*: 8.62%
• 5Y*: -0.07%
• 10Y*: 5.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	6.04%	25.77%	9.32%	7.37%	4.80%	18.00%	-11.78%	4.12%
CNAA.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR	9.28%	17.14%	12.85%	-18.49%	-17.18%	4.19%	38.58%	-3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between 100D.L and CNAA.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019	0.30

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	100D.L	CNAA.L
Financial Services	24.5%	18.8%
Consumer Defensive	13.9%	7.4%
Industrials	13.7%	15.7%
Healthcare	13.6%	4.3%
Energy	11.7%	3.4%
Basic Materials	8.5%	12.4%
Utilities	5.3%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	5.6%
Communication Services	2.6%	1.4%
Real Estate	0.9%	0.6%
Technology	0.8%	27.2%

Return for Risk

100D.L vs. CNAA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

100D.L

100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 49

CNAA.L

CNAA.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
CNAA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CNAA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
CNAA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
CNAA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CNAA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	100D.L	CNAA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.27	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	3.05	-0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.41	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.38	5.33	-2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	14.88	-6.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 100D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the CNAA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 100D.L and CNAA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	100D.L	CNAA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.94	2.27	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	-0.00	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.28	+0.25

Drawdowns

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 100D.L drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, smaller than the maximum CNAA.L drawdown of -50.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 100D.L and CNAA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	100D.L	CNAA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.63%	-50.93%	+16.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.92%	-7.02%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.06%	-26.66%	+13.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.06%	-42.50%	+29.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.00%	-11.17%	+7.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.69%	-25.94%	+21.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.52%	+0.12%

Volatility

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) is 3.98%, while Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR (CNAA.L) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that 100D.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	100D.L	CNAA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.98%	5.85%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	11.80%	-2.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.96%	16.50%	-5.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.88%	21.53%	-8.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.92%	22.43%	-6.51%

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

100D.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAA.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

100D.L vs. CNAA.L - Dividend Comparison

100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while CNAA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
100D.L Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF	3.57%	3.78%	4.17%	3.90%	3.80%	3.39%	3.11%	4.30%
CNAA.L Lyxor Fortune SG UCITS MSCI China A DR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 100D.L and CNAA.L in my portfolio?

100D.L and CNAA.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, 100D.L or CNAA.L?

On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, 100D.L or CNAA.L?

100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CNAA.L.

What is the main difference between 100D.L and CNAA.L?

100D.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CNAA.L is China Equities. 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while CNAA.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 100D.L and 0.35% for CNAA.L.