PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
100D.L vs. 500U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

100D.L is traded in GBp, while 500U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the 500U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 100D.L achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly lower than 500U.L's 10.84% return.


100D.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.04%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.31%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*

500U.L

1D
0.00%
1M
5.46%
YTD
10.84%
6M
10.45%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
16.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
6.04%25.77%9.32%7.37%4.80%18.00%-11.78%4.12%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.86%9.90%26.63%20.51%-9.65%31.37%13.61%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between 100D.L and 500U.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.54

The correlation between 100D.L and 500U.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
100D.L
500U.L

Financial Services

24.5%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

13.9%
4.9%

Industrials

13.7%
8.3%

Healthcare

13.6%
8.5%

Energy

11.7%
3.5%

Basic Materials

8.5%
1.8%

Utilities

5.3%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
10.1%

Communication Services

2.6%
11.2%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.9%

Technology

0.8%
35.6%

Financial Services

100D.L
24.5%
500U.L
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

100D.L
13.9%
500U.L
4.9%

Industrials

100D.L
13.7%
500U.L
8.3%

Healthcare

100D.L
13.6%
500U.L
8.5%

Energy

100D.L
11.7%
500U.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

100D.L
8.5%
500U.L
1.8%

Utilities

100D.L
5.3%
500U.L
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

100D.L
4.7%
500U.L
10.1%

Communication Services

100D.L
2.6%
500U.L
11.2%

Real Estate

100D.L
0.9%
500U.L
1.9%

Technology

100D.L
0.8%
500U.L
35.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

100D.L vs. 500U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

100D.L
100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

500U.L
500U.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
500U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
500U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
500U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
500U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
500U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) and Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


100D.L500U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.45

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

4.04

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

13.57

-5.51

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 100D.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the 500U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 100D.L and 500U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


100D.L500U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.45

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.00

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

1.33

-0.80

Drawdowns

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 100D.L drawdown since its inception was -34.63%, which is greater than 500U.L's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 100D.L and 500U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


100D.L500U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.63%

-26.14%

-8.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-7.19%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-20.95%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.06%

-20.95%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.00%

-0.22%

-3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-3.62%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

2.15%

+0.49%

Volatility

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc (500U.L) at 3.59%. This indicates that 100D.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 500U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


100D.L500U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

3.59%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

8.66%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.96%

11.86%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.88%

15.26%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

18.56%

-2.64%

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

100D.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than 500U.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

100D.L vs. 500U.L - Dividend Comparison

100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, while 500U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
3.57%3.78%4.17%3.90%3.80%3.39%3.11%4.30%
500U.L
Amundi S&P 500 Swap UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


100D.L and 500U.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 500U.L.

100D.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while 500U.L is S&P 500. 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while 500U.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for 100D.L and 0.15% for 500U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 100D.L and 500U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer