PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0TPE.L is traded in EUR, while TIPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TIPA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0TPE.L achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than TIPA.L's 2.97% return.


0TPE.L

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.75%
6M
-0.38%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
1.50%
3Y*
1.66%
5Y*
-1.56%
10Y*

TIPA.L

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.47%
6M
1.86%
YTD
2.97%
1Y
4.60%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
0.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
0TPE.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)
-0.01%4.47%0.00%1.38%-13.90%4.61%8.93%0.31%
TIPA.L
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
2.97%-5.85%8.84%0.40%-7.43%14.31%1.89%-1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between 0TPE.L and TIPA.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2019

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0TPE.L
0TPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
0TPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
0TPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

TIPA.L
TIPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
TIPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L) and Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0TPE.LTIPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.13

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.01

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.62

2.76

-1.15

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0TPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the TIPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0TPE.L and TIPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0TPE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.53%, which is greater than TIPA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0TPE.L and TIPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0TPE.LTIPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-15.27%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.01%

-4.53%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.87%

-11.08%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.53%

-15.27%

-3.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.19%

-7.63%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-6.90%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.66%

-0.73%

Volatility

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (0TPE.L) is 1.19%, while Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that 0TPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0TPE.LTIPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.50%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

4.53%

-1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76%

6.29%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

8.62%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

8.65%

+0.14%

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

0TPE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TIPA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

0TPE.L vs. TIPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither 0TPE.L nor TIPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


0TPE.L and TIPA.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 0TPE.L.

0TPE.L tracks Bloomberg US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index, while TIPA.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for 0TPE.L and 0.09% for TIPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0TPE.L and TIPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer