PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc) (0NS.DE) and Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

0NS.DE is traded in USD, while XBO2.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XBO2.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0NS.DE achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than XBO2.DE's -2.01% return.


0NS.DE

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.27%
YTD
-0.12%
1Y
0.71%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
10Y*

XBO2.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.41%
6M
-0.54%
YTD
-2.01%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
1.09%
10Y*
1.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
0NS.DE
Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc)
-0.12%7.50%0.72%4.96%-24.78%
XBO2.DE
Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
-2.01%15.62%-2.39%6.29%-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between 0NS.DE and XBO2.DE is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2022

0.65

The correlation between 0NS.DE and XBO2.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0NS.DE
0NS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
0NS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
0NS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XBO2.DE
XBO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc) (0NS.DE) and Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


0NS.DEXBO2.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.01

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.28

0.07

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.58

0.14

+0.44

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0NS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the XBO2.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0NS.DE and XBO2.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0NS.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum XBO2.DE drawdown of -32.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0NS.DE and XBO2.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0NS.DEXBO2.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-32.95%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-5.05%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-7.57%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-11.75%

-2.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.70%

-15.92%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

2.45%

-1.23%

Volatility

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi US Treasury Bond 0-1Y UCITS ETF SGD Hedged (Acc) (0NS.DE) is 0.82%, while Xtrackers II Italy Government Bond 0-1 Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XBO2.DE) has a volatility of 1.56%. This indicates that 0NS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XBO2.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0NS.DEXBO2.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

1.56%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

5.25%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86%

7.03%

-3.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.29%

7.78%

+6.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.29%

7.43%

+6.86%

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

0NS.DE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XBO2.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

0NS.DE vs. XBO2.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 0NS.DE nor XBO2.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


0NS.DE and XBO2.DE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 0NS.DE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

0NS.DE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XBO2.DE.

0NS.DE tracks Bloomberg US Short Treasury Index (SGD Hedged), while XBO2.DE tracks FTSE Eurozone BOT Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for 0NS.DE and 0.15% for XBO2.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0NS.DE and XBO2.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer