0998.HK vs. 1988.HK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

0998.HK (China Citic Bank Corp Ltd) and 1988.HK (China Minsheng Banking) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, 0998.HK returned 13.28%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for 1988.HK. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Citic Bank Corp Ltd (0998.HK) and China Minsheng Banking (1988.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0998.HK achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly higher than 1988.HK's -13.49% return. Over the past 10 years, 0998.HK has outperformed 1988.HK with an annualized return of 13.28%, while 1988.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 0.54% annualized return.

0998.HK

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -9.57%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 5.35%
• 1Y: 10.71%
• 3Y*: 35.79%
• 5Y*: 24.67%
• 10Y*: 13.28%

1988.HK

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -6.34%
• YTD: -13.49%
• 6M: -20.37%
• 1Y: -13.53%
• 3Y*: 11.62%
• 5Y*: 4.45%
• 10Y*: 0.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0998.HK China Citic Bank Corp Ltd	8.54%	36.19%	76.83%	16.82%	12.94%	11.20%	-24.20%	3.99%	2.87%	4.44%
1988.HK China Minsheng Banking	-13.49%	19.99%	48.01%	6.26%	-1.55%	-27.89%	-18.77%	16.98%	-15.68%	-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between 0998.HK and 1988.HK is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2009	0.69

The correlation between 0998.HK and 1988.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0998.HK

0998.HK Risk / Return Rank: 55
0998.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
0998.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
0998.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 50
0998.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
0998.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 57

1988.HK

1988.HK Risk / Return Rank: 23
1988.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
1988.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
1988.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 19
1988.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
1988.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Citic Bank Corp Ltd (0998.HK) and China Minsheng Banking (1988.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	0998.HK	1988.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.54	-0.54	+1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.98	-0.63	+1.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.93	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	-0.38	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.49	-0.61	+2.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0998.HK Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the 1988.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0998.HK and 1988.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	0998.HK	1988.HK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54	-0.54	+1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.13	0.18	+0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.02	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.10	+0.11

Drawdowns

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0998.HK drawdown since its inception was -69.05%, which is greater than 1988.HK's maximum drawdown of -64.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0998.HK and 1988.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	0998.HK	1988.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.05%	-64.94%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.50%	-36.55%	+19.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.50%	-36.55%	+19.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.76%	-37.79%	+18.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.73%	-60.21%	+13.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.90%	-35.79%	+23.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.65%	-28.95%	+5.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.05%	22.58%	-14.53%

Volatility

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK - Volatility Comparison

China Citic Bank Corp Ltd (0998.HK) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to China Minsheng Banking (1988.HK) at 5.71%. This indicates that 0998.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 1988.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0998.HK	1988.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.50%	5.71%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.65%	16.48%	-0.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.35%	26.10%	-3.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.43%	26.17%	-3.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.24%	24.26%	-2.02%

Dividends

0998.HK vs. 1988.HK - Dividend Comparison

0998.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than 1988.HK's 6.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0998.HK China Citic Bank Corp Ltd	8.39%	5.68%	17.60%	9.78%	10.22%	9.03%	7.94%	5.60%	6.74%	4.97%	5.10%	0.00%
1988.HK China Minsheng Banking	6.39%	5.52%	11.01%	8.90%	9.24%	8.69%	9.16%	6.68%	2.42%	4.22%	4.97%	1.82%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 0998.HK and 1988.HK in my portfolio?

0998.HK and 1988.HK have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.