PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
0914.HK vs. 0763.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Anhui Conch Cement (0914.HK) and ZTE Corp-H (0763.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0914.HK achieves a -12.45% return, which is significantly lower than 0763.HK's 4.57% return. Over the past 10 years, 0914.HK has underperformed 0763.HK with an annualized return of 4.89%, while 0763.HK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


0914.HK

1D
-0.11%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
-12.45%
6M
-18.84%
1Y
-1.08%
3Y*
1.58%
5Y*
-10.41%
10Y*
4.89%

0763.HK

1D
5.27%
1M
3.58%
YTD
4.57%
6M
-12.35%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
8.22%
10Y*
12.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
0914.HK
Anhui Conch Cement
-12.45%16.72%16.55%-28.35%-24.72%-15.30%-11.23%56.03%6.66%78.08%
0763.HK
ZTE Corp-H
4.57%14.61%45.85%3.26%-17.47%10.61%-17.53%61.15%-49.57%117.73%

Correlation

The correlation between 0914.HK and 0763.HK is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2004

0.34

The correlation between 0914.HK and 0763.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0914.HK
0914.HK Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
0914.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0914.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
0914.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
0914.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
0914.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

0763.HK
0763.HK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
0763.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0763.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
0763.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
0763.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
0763.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anhui Conch Cement (0914.HK) and ZTE Corp-H (0763.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


0914.HK0763.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.14

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.56

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.16

0.96

-1.12

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0914.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the 0763.HK Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0914.HK and 0763.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


0914.HK0763.HKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

0.49

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.16

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

0.23

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.17

+0.18

Drawdowns

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0914.HK drawdown since its inception was -82.84%, which is greater than 0763.HK's maximum drawdown of -71.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0914.HK and 0763.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


0914.HK0763.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.84%

-71.67%

-11.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.30%

-49.65%

+19.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.50%

-57.50%

+23.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.23%

-59.30%

-3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.06%

-69.50%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.72%

-34.46%

-22.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.54%

-31.10%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.94%

28.76%

-15.82%

Volatility

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Anhui Conch Cement (0914.HK) is 6.45%, while ZTE Corp-H (0763.HK) has a volatility of 18.58%. This indicates that 0914.HK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0763.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


0914.HK0763.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.45%

18.58%

-12.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.13%

36.11%

-13.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.35%

57.37%

-25.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.00%

53.26%

-18.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.92%

55.72%

-21.80%

Dividends

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Dividend Comparison

0914.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, while 0763.HK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0763.HK
ZTE Corp-H
0.00%2.46%3.07%2.62%2.14%1.12%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.19%1.72%
0914.HK
Anhui Conch Cement
5.17%4.69%5.30%9.09%10.23%6.58%4.49%3.39%3.88%1.54%2.41%3.95%

Financials

0914.HK vs. 0763.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anhui Conch Cement and ZTE Corp-H. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in HKD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


0914.HK and 0763.HK have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 0914.HK and 0763.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer