0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE
0728.HK (China Telecom) is a stock, while PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) is Gold fund tracking the Gold. Over the past 3 years, 0728.HK returned 13.49%/yr vs 31.51%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
0728.HK is traded in HKD, while PPFB.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the PPFB.DE values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0728.HK achieves a -7.06% return, which is significantly lower than PPFB.DE's 2.24% return.
0728.HK
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -9.09%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -11.34%
- 1Y
- -9.67%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 22.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.02%
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 30.37%
- 3Y*
- 31.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0728.HK China Telecom | -7.06% | 16.32% | 38.46% | 29.65% | 32.90% | -13.04% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.24% | 68.64% | 25.81% | 12.86% | 1.27% | -0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between 0728.HK and PPFB.DE is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
0728.HK
PPFB.DE
0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Telecom (0728.HK) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| 0728.HK | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.25 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 1.88 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | 4.82 | -5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0728.HK drawdown since its inception was -71.89%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0728.HK and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0728.HK | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.89% | -21.10% | -50.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.83% | -17.05% | -5.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.24% | -17.05% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.66% | -15.43% | -6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.50% | -5.31% | -26.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.67% | 6.67% | +6.00% |
Volatility
0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
China Telecom (0728.HK) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 5.68%. This indicates that 0728.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| 0728.HK | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 5.68% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.00% | 21.08% | -4.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.83% | 24.29% | -3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 17.35% | +9.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.44% | 17.35% | +10.09% |
Dividends
0728.HK vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
0728.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, while PPFB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0728.HK China Telecom | 6.17% | 5.56% | 5.77% | 6.46% | 10.97% | 4.81% | 5.81% | 3.89% | 2.88% | 2.82% | 2.65% | 2.61% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
0728.HK and PPFB.DE have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for 0728.HK and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer