0316.HK vs. 0939.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about Orient Overseas International Ltd (0316.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK).
Performance
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0316.HK Orient Overseas International Ltd | 10.45% | 22.31% | 11.96% | 7.35% | 3.91% | 231.65% | 119.73% | -6.17% | -29.71% | 135.07% |
0939.HK China Construction Bank Corp | 9.88% | 30.12% | 50.75% | 3.86% | -2.12% | -2.09% | -7.31% | 9.88% | -5.73% | 26.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 0316.HK achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly higher than 0939.HK's 9.88% return. Over the past 10 years, 0316.HK has outperformed 0939.HK with an annualized return of 35.37%, while 0939.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 12.98% annualized return.
0316.HK
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 10.18%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 26.84%
- 10Y*
- 35.37%
0939.HK
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 6.29%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 29.29%
- 3Y*
- 29.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK — Risk / Return Rank
0316.HK
0939.HK
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Orient Overseas International Ltd (0316.HK) and China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| 0316.HK | 0939.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.32 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.37 | 1.77 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.15 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 4.92 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| 0316.HK | 0939.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.32 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.69 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.61 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.24 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between 0316.HK and 0939.HK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK - Dividend Comparison
0316.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.49%, more than 0939.HK's 5.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0316.HK Orient Overseas International Ltd | 11.49% | 12.69% | 5.50% | 38.79% | 51.45% | 23.56% | 3.18% | 35.98% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.45% | 2.74% |
0939.HK China Construction Bank Corp | 5.05% | 8.32% | 6.77% | 9.08% | 8.71% | 7.24% | 5.94% | 5.19% | 5.34% | 4.44% | 5.41% | 7.18% |
Drawdowns
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0316.HK drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, which is greater than 0939.HK's maximum drawdown of -69.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0316.HK and 0939.HK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| 0316.HK | 0939.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.34% | -69.85% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.09% | -14.15% | -0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.07% | -27.41% | -20.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.29% | -38.35% | -19.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.23% | 0.00% | -12.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.22% | -20.05% | -7.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 6.18% | +1.43% |
Volatility
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK - Volatility Comparison
Orient Overseas International Ltd (0316.HK) has a higher volatility of 10.52% compared to China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) at 6.26%. This indicates that 0316.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 0939.HK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| 0316.HK | 0939.HK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.52% | 6.26% | +4.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.01% | 14.22% | +4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.17% | 22.78% | +9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.60% | 21.12% | +28.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.11% | 21.81% | +25.30% |
Financials
0316.HK vs. 0939.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Orient Overseas International Ltd and China Construction Bank Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities