0939.HK vs. 0386.HK
Compare and contrast key facts about China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 0939.HK or 0386.HK.
Key characteristics
0939.HK | 0386.HK | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 21.29% | 24.45% |
1Y Return | 13.23% | 6.51% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 4.74% | 19.42% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 4.38% | 7.54% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 7.19% | 4.22% |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.84 | 0.23 |
Daily Std Dev | 21.24% | 25.45% |
Max Drawdown | -69.85% | -71.31% |
Current Drawdown | -8.06% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
0939.HK | 0386.HK | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | HK$1.32T | HK$781.14B |
EPS | HK$1.34 | HK$0.50 |
PE Ratio | 3.65 | 8.36 |
PEG Ratio | 0.79 | 2.49 |
Revenue (TTM) | HK$620.10B | HK$3.21T |
Gross Profit (TTM) | HK$667.93B | HK$632.19B |
Correlation
The correlation between 0939.HK and 0386.HK is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
0939.HK vs. 0386.HK - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, 0939.HK achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly lower than 0386.HK's 24.45% return. Over the past 10 years, 0939.HK has outperformed 0386.HK with an annualized return of 7.19%, while 0386.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 4.22% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0939.HK vs. 0386.HK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
0939.HK vs. 0386.HK - Dividend Comparison
0939.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than 0386.HK's 7.36% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
China Construction Bank Corp | 7.48% | 9.08% | 8.71% | 7.24% | 5.94% | 5.19% | 5.34% | 4.44% | 5.41% | 7.18% | 5.93% | 5.76% |
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H | 7.36% | 9.16% | 14.50% | 9.62% | 8.29% | 9.32% | 12.09% | 5.44% | 2.98% | 5.31% | 4.84% | 3.71% |
Drawdowns
0939.HK vs. 0386.HK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 0939.HK drawdown since its inception was -69.85%, roughly equal to the maximum 0386.HK drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0939.HK and 0386.HK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
0939.HK vs. 0386.HK - Volatility Comparison
China Construction Bank Corp (0939.HK) and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H (0386.HK) have volatilities of 7.61% and 7.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
0939.HK vs. 0386.HK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Construction Bank Corp and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp Class H. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities