PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
020Y.L vs. GBPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF (020Y.L) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

020Y.L is traded in EUR, while GBPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GBPG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 020Y.L achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than GBPG.L's 6.54% return.


020Y.L

1D
-0.14%
1M
-3.05%
6M
-2.14%
YTD
-1.53%
1Y
-4.31%
3Y*
-3.47%
5Y*
-10.94%
10Y*

GBPG.L

1D
0.79%
1M
1.73%
6M
1.82%
YTD
6.54%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
4.57%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
020Y.L
iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF
-1.53%-10.89%-5.04%7.85%-36.19%-2.11%
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
6.54%-3.10%5.00%6.49%-13.83%1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between 020Y.L and GBPG.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

020Y.L
020Y.L Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
020Y.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
020Y.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
020Y.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
020Y.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
020Y.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GBPG.L
GBPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF (020Y.L) and Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


020Y.LGBPG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.15

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.60

1.52

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

4.34

-5.44

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 020Y.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the GBPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 020Y.L and GBPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 020Y.L drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than GBPG.L's maximum drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 020Y.L and GBPG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


020Y.LGBPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-19.63%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-3.31%

-3.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-4.87%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.12%

-1.10%

-47.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-6.92%

-26.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.91%

1.16%

+2.75%

Volatility

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF (020Y.L) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist) (GBPG.L) at 1.52%. This indicates that 020Y.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GBPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


020Y.LGBPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

1.52%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.06%

4.25%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

7.14%

+3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.03%

7.71%

+36.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.94%

7.71%

+33.23%

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

020Y.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GBPG.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

020Y.L vs. GBPG.L - Dividend Comparison

020Y.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than GBPG.L's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
020Y.L
iShares € Govt Bond 20yr Target Duration UCITS ETF
3.65%3.42%2.94%2.11%0.91%0.10%0.11%
GBPG.L
Goldman Sachs Access UK Gilts 1-10 Years UCITS ETF Class GBP (Dist)
4.07%4.13%4.10%3.35%0.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


020Y.L and GBPG.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPG.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPG.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for 020Y.L.

020Y.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Eurozone 20yr Target Duration Index, while GBPG.L tracks FTSE Act UK Cnvt Gilts All Stocks TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for 020Y.L and 0.07% for GBPG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 020Y.L and GBPG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer