0027.HK vs. 1928.HK

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

0027.HK (Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd) and 1928.HK (Sands China Ltd) are both stocks. Both operate in the Resorts & Casinos industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, 0027.HK returned 4.32%/yr vs -4.70%/yr for 1928.HK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd (0027.HK) and Sands China Ltd (1928.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 0027.HK achieves a -15.24% return, which is significantly higher than 1928.HK's -29.07% return. Over the past 10 years, 0027.HK has outperformed 1928.HK with an annualized return of 4.32%, while 1928.HK has yielded a comparatively lower -4.70% annualized return.

0027.HK

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 5.25%
• 6M: -19.64%
• YTD: -15.24%
• 1Y: -10.95%
• 3Y*: -13.74%
• 5Y*: -9.94%
• 10Y*: 4.32%
• ALL TIME*: 8.43%

1928.HK

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -3.10%
• 6M: -24.65%
• YTD: -29.07%
• 1Y: -23.77%
• 3Y*: -19.67%
• 5Y*: -13.94%
• 10Y*: -4.70%
• ALL TIME*: 5.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
0027.HK Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd	-15.24%	20.00%	-22.76%	-14.88%	28.55%	-32.95%	6.05%	17.31%	-19.35%	87.82%
1928.HK Sands China Ltd	-29.07%	-3.50%	-8.53%	-11.78%	42.62%	-46.82%	-15.81%	28.34%	-11.25%	26.87%

Correlation

The correlation between 0027.HK and 1928.HK is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2009	0.75

The correlation between 0027.HK and 1928.HK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

0027.HK

0027.HK Risk / Return Rank: 29
0027.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
0027.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
0027.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 27
0027.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
0027.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 32

1928.HK

1928.HK Risk / Return Rank: 17
1928.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
1928.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
1928.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 17
1928.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
1928.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd (0027.HK) and Sands China Ltd (1928.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	0027.HK	1928.HK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.39	-0.73	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.38	-0.92	+0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.90	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	-0.61	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.70	-1.21	+0.51

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 0027.HK Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is higher than the 1928.HK Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 0027.HK and 1928.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 0027.HK drawdown since its inception was -94.20%, which is greater than 1928.HK's maximum drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 0027.HK and 1928.HK.

Drawdown Indicators

	0027.HK	1928.HK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.20%	-73.04%	-21.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.81%	-39.99%	+8.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.68%	-58.38%	+4.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.95%	-58.38%	+3.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.22%	-70.75%	+4.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.62%	-69.92%	+14.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.72%	-33.88%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.86%	19.83%	-3.97%

Volatility

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK - Volatility Comparison

Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd (0027.HK) and Sands China Ltd (1928.HK) have volatilities of 8.68% and 9.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	0027.HK	1928.HK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.68%	9.12%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.20%	21.78%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.86%	33.29%	-4.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.04%	48.57%	-10.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.58%	41.62%	-4.04%

Dividends

0027.HK vs. 1928.HK - Dividend Comparison

0027.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than 1928.HK's 5.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
0027.HK Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd	4.73%	3.13%	2.42%	0.46%	0.58%	0.00%	0.75%	1.59%	1.83%	0.94%	0.98%	1.72%
1928.HK Sands China Ltd	5.57%	2.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.90%	4.78%	5.80%	4.93%	5.91%	7.50%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both 0027.HK and 1928.HK in my portfolio?

0027.HK and 1928.HK have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.