PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^SPSY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^SPSY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 Financials Index (^SPSY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^SPSY vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^SPSY
S&P 500 Financials Index
-12.64%13.32%28.43%9.94%-12.35%32.54%-4.10%29.17%-14.67%20.03%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^SPSY achieves a -12.64% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ^SPSY has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 10.16%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


^SPSY

1D
-2.49%
1M
-6.46%
YTD
-12.64%
6M
-10.38%
1Y
-3.84%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
6.84%
10Y*
10.16%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^SPSY vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SPSY
^SPSY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
^SPSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^SPSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
^SPSY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
^SPSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
^SPSY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SPSY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 Financials Index (^SPSY) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^SPSY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

0.92

-1.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

1.41

-1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.21

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

1.41

-1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.01

6.61

-7.62

^SPSY vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^SPSY Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^SPSY and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^SPSY^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

0.92

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.61

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.68

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.46

-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between ^SPSY and ^GSPC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^SPSY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SPSY drawdown since its inception was -83.96%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SPSY and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^SPSY^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.96%

-56.78%

-27.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.06%

-12.14%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-25.43%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-33.92%

-9.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.06%

-5.78%

-9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.68%

-10.75%

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.87%

2.60%

+2.27%

Volatility

^SPSY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 Financials Index (^SPSY) is 4.19%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that ^SPSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^SPSY^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

5.37%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.17%

9.55%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.29%

18.33%

+0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.73%

16.90%

+1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

18.05%

+4.25%