^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

^RTSI (RTS Index) is an index, while XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Over the past 10 years, ^RTSI returned 2.34%/yr vs 26.77%/yr for XLKQ.L. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RTS Index (^RTSI) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

^RTSI is traded in USD, while XLKQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLKQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^RTSI achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 27.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ^RTSI has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 2.34%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 26.77% annualized return.

^RTSI

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.60%
• YTD: 2.09%
• 6M: 4.86%
• 1Y: 0.97%
• 3Y*: 2.65%
• 5Y*: -7.02%
• 10Y*: 2.34%

XLKQ.L

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: 18.87%
• YTD: 27.51%
• 6M: 27.09%
• 1Y: 61.89%
• 3Y*: 38.25%
• 5Y*: 26.42%
• 10Y*: 26.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
^RTSI RTS Index	2.09%	24.73%	-17.56%	11.63%	-39.18%	15.01%	-10.42%	44.93%	-7.42%	0.18%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	27.51%	24.49%	41.63%	59.85%	-29.07%	35.05%	42.15%	50.99%	-4.30%	34.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ^RTSI and XLKQ.L is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2014	0.24

The correlation between ^RTSI and XLKQ.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^RTSI

^RTSI Risk / Return Rank: 12
^RTSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
^RTSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
^RTSI Omega Ratio Rank: 13
^RTSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
^RTSI Martin Ratio Rank: 11

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 86
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RTS Index (^RTSI) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	^RTSI	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	3.16	-3.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	4.04	-3.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.51	-0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.00	3.50	-3.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.01	10.64	-10.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^RTSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^RTSI and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	^RTSI	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	3.16	-3.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	1.14	-1.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08	1.27	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	1.19	-0.97

Drawdowns

^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^RTSI drawdown since its inception was -93.26%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -35.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^RTSI and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	^RTSI	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.26%	-35.00%	-58.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.79%	-16.81%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.03%	-26.96%	-13.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.14%	-35.00%	-27.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.14%	-35.00%	-27.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.28%	0.00%	-54.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.30%	-5.75%	-37.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.19%	5.52%	+2.67%

Volatility

^RTSI vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

RTS Index (^RTSI) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) have volatilities of 5.75% and 5.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	^RTSI	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.75%	5.95%	-0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.73%	14.67%	-1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.01%	19.52%	+1.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.05%	23.30%	+12.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.01%	22.21%	+8.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ^RTSI and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

^RTSI and XLKQ.L have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.