PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^OOI vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^OOI vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P Global 100 Index (^OOI) and Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^OOI vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^OOI
S&P Global 100 Index
-4.02%25.76%25.21%25.35%-17.62%23.90%16.63%26.80%-8.23%20.59%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc Class A
-4.92%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-0.80%32.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^OOI achieves a -4.02% return, which is significantly higher than GOOGL's -4.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ^OOI has underperformed GOOGL with an annualized return of 13.05%, while GOOGL has yielded a comparatively higher 22.79% annualized return.


^OOI

1D
1.29%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
0.93%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
13.05%

GOOGL

1D
3.42%
1M
-2.91%
YTD
-4.92%
6M
21.60%
1Y
89.99%
3Y*
42.45%
5Y*
23.00%
10Y*
22.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^OOI vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^OOI
^OOI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
^OOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^OOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
^OOI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
^OOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
^OOI Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^OOI vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P Global 100 Index (^OOI) and Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^OOIGOOGLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

2.95

-1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.14

3.90

-1.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

4.57

-1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.62

17.62

-3.00

^OOI vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^OOI Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^OOI and GOOGL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^OOIGOOGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

2.95

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.75

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.79

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.64

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between ^OOI and GOOGL is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Drawdowns

^OOI vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^OOI drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum GOOGL drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^OOI and GOOGL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^OOIGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.27%

-65.29%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.92%

-20.37%

+8.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.25%

-44.32%

+20.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.27%

-44.32%

+13.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.38%

-13.41%

+7.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.20%

-19.15%

+4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

5.28%

-3.16%

Volatility

^OOI vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P Global 100 Index (^OOI) is 5.32%, while Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that ^OOI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^OOIGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

9.76%

-4.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

19.99%

-10.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

30.72%

-14.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

30.87%

-15.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

28.85%

-12.90%